Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm (MISSION trial-NCT02324595): a feasibility study

被引:67
作者
Alletti, Salvatore Gueli [1 ]
Bottoni, Carolina
Fanfani, Francesco [2 ]
Gallotta, Valerio [1 ]
Chiantera, Vito [3 ]
Costantini, Barbara [1 ]
Cosentino, Francesco [1 ]
Ercoli, Alfredo [4 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [1 ]
Fagotti, Anna [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Med & Aging Sci, Chieti, Italy
[3] Univ Molise, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Giovanni Paolo 2, Campobasso, Italy
[4] Policlin Abano Terme, Dept Gynecol, Padua, Italy
[5] Univ Perugia, St Maria Hosp, Minimally Invas Gynecol, Terni, Italy
关键词
advanced ovarian cancer; interval debulking surgery; laparoscopic cytoreduction; minimally invasive surgery; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; quality of life; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; EVALUATION CRITERIA; PERITONEAL CANCERS; FALLOPIAN-TUBE; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; TRIALS; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.922
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has acquired an increasing role in the management of ovarian cancer. Laparoscopic cytoreduction could represent a new frontier for selected patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess feasibility and early complication rate of minimally invasive (MI) interval debulking surgery (IDS) in stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients after NACT. STUDY DESIGN: This is a phase II multicentric study in advanced EOC cases with clinical complete response after NACT, according to Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria. Institutional review board approval was obtained and all patients signed written informed consent to be included in the protocol. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02324595) and was named "MISSION" trial. For patients meeting inclusion criteria, surgical procedures started with diagnostic laparoscopy to confirm preoperative findings and assess surgical complexity. MI-IDS included hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, appendectomy, omentectomy, peritonectomy, and bowel resection. Pelvic and/or aortic lymphadenectomy was not considered as standard procedure in these cases. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, time to restart chemotherapy, survival rate, and quality of life data were registered. RESULTS: From December 2013 through February 2015, of 184 advanced EOC patients considered eligible for IDS, 52 (28.2%) met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. For 22 (12%) of them, standard laparotomic approach was preferred because of intraoperative surgeon evaluation. Thirty (16.3%) patients received the planned treatment of MI-IDS. Median age was 61 (range 39-81) years and median body mass index was 24 (range 20-31) kg/m(2). Median numbers of NACT cycles was 4 (range 3-7). Median operative time was 285 (range 124-418) minutes and median estimated blood loss was 100 (range 50-200) mL. Surgical procedures included 28 (93.3%) hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 29 (96.6%) omentectomy, 2 (6.6%) appendectomy, 11 (36.6%) regional peritonectomy, and 1 (3.4%) bowel resection. A residual tumor of 0 cm was reached in 29 (96.6%) patients and 0.5 cm in only 1 (3.4%) case. The vast majority of patients were discharged on postoperative day 2 (range 2-3). No early postoperative complications were registered. Median time to restart chemotherapy was 20 (10-30) days and all patients successfully completed the cycles. Histological findings showed 3 (10%) complete response, 9 (30%) microscopic residual disease, and 18 (60%) evidence of macroscopic residual disease. With a median follow-up of 10.5 month, 5 peritoneal and 2 lymph nodal recurrences were observed. Psychometric test revealed moderate discomfort in the vast majority of patients (66.7%). All patients are still alive. CONCLUSION: Invasive-IDS in patients with clinically complete response to NACT seems to be feasible and safe in terms of perioperative outcomes, psycho-oncological impact, and survival rate. The equivalence between MI surgery and laparotomy needs to be confirmed with a longer follow-up and a larger number of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:503.e1 / 503.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   CA-125 can be part of the tumour evaluation criteria in ovarian cancer trials: experience of the GCIG CALYPSO trial [J].
Alexandre, J. ;
Brown, C. ;
Coeffic, D. ;
Raban, N. ;
Pfisterer, J. ;
Maenpaa, J. ;
Chalchal, H. ;
Fitzharris, B. ;
Volgger, B. ;
Vergote, I. ;
Pisano, C. ;
Ferrero, A. ;
Pujade-Lauraine, E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 106 (04) :633-637
[2]   Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Management of Stage IIIC-IV Ovarian Cancer Survey Results from the Members of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology [J].
Cornelis, Sarah ;
Van Calster, Ben ;
Amant, Frederic ;
Leunen, Karin ;
van der Zee, Ate Gerard Jan ;
Vergote, Ignace .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2012, 22 (03) :407-416
[3]   Laparoscopic Debulking Surgery in the Management of Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [J].
Corrado, Giacomo ;
Mancini, Emanuela ;
Cutillo, Giuseppe ;
Baiocco, Ermelinda ;
Vici, Patrizia ;
Sergi, Domenico ;
Patrizi, Lodovico ;
Saltari, Maria ;
Baffa, Alberto ;
Vizza, Enrico .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (07) :1253-1257
[4]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[5]   Should laparoscopy be included in the work-up of advanced ovarian cancer patients attempting interval debulking surgery? [J].
Fagotti, A. ;
Fanfani, F. ;
Vizzielli, G. ;
Gallotta, V. ;
Ercoli, A. ;
Paglia, A. ;
Costantini, B. ;
Vigliotta, M. ;
Scambia, G. ;
Ferrandina, G. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 116 (01) :72-77
[6]   Systematic Pelvic and Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients at the Time of Interval Debulking Surgery: A Double-Institution Case-Control Study [J].
Fagotti, Anna ;
De Iaco, Pierandrea ;
Fanfani, Francesco ;
Vizzielli, Giuseppe ;
Perelli, Federica ;
Pozzati, Federica ;
Perrone, Anna Myriam ;
Turco, Luigi Carlo ;
Scambia, Giovanni .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (11) :3522-3527
[7]   Prospective validation of a laparoscopic predictive model for optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian carcinoma [J].
Fagotti, Anna ;
Ferrandina, Gabriella ;
Fanfani, Francesco ;
Garganese, Giorgia ;
Vizzielli, Giuseppe ;
Carone, Vito ;
Salerno, Maria Giovanna ;
Scambia, Giovanni .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (06) :642.e1-642.e6
[8]   Impact of interval debulking surgery on clinical outcome in primary unresectable FIGO stage IIIc ovarian cancer patients [J].
Fanfani, F ;
Ferrandina, G ;
Corrado, G ;
Fagotti, A ;
Zakut, HV ;
Mancuso, S ;
Scambia, G .
ONCOLOGY, 2003, 65 (04) :316-322
[9]   Oncologic Concerns regarding Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Submitted to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [J].
Favero, Giovanni ;
Macerox, Nathalia ;
Pfiffer, Tatiana ;
Koehler, Christhardt ;
Miranda, Vanessa da Costa ;
Estevez Diz, Maria Del Pilar ;
Fukushima, Julia Tizue ;
Baracat, Edmund Chada ;
Carvalho, Jesus Paula .
ONCOLOGY, 2015, 89 (03) :159-166
[10]   Laparoscopic staging of apparent early stage ovarian cancer: Results of a large, retrospective, multi-institutional series [J].
Gallotta, V. ;
Ghezzi, F. ;
Vizza, E. ;
Chiantera, V. ;
Ceccaroni, M. ;
Franchi, M. ;
Fagotti, A. ;
Ercoli, A. ;
Fanfani, F. ;
Parrino, C. ;
Uccella, S. ;
Corrado, G. ;
Scambia, G. ;
Ferrandina, G. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 135 (03) :428-434