Comparison of Heuristics Towards Approaching a Scheduling and Capacity Planning MINLP for Hydrogen Storage in Chemical Substances

被引:2
作者
Beerbuehl, Simon Schulte [1 ]
Froehling, Magnus [1 ]
Schultmann, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Ind Prod, D-76187 Karlsruhe, Germany
来源
OPERATIONS RESEARCH PROCEEDINGS 2013 | 2014年
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-07001-8_56
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The need for scheduling and capacity planning of electricity and energy storage technologies has risen in line with growing feed-in of intermittent wind and solar power. Hydrogen-based storage technologies usually feature non-linear as well as non-differentiable operating characteristics. This paper discusses different approaches towards integrating consumption figures derived from engineering simulations into scheduling and capacity planning problems. The comparison of best-fit functions to a heuristic-based approach of using comparably rapidly computable functions in addition with adjustment calculations shows, that reduction in complexity and calculation time leads to discrepancies at cost and furthermore at scheduling and capacity size level. Cost effects can be minimized by the heuristics, but different scheduling and capacity choice remains.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 419
页数:7
相关论文
共 3 条
[1]  
Epe A., 2009, INNOVATIVE MODELLIER, P10
[2]  
Gollmer R., 1997, VDI BER, P71
[3]   Storage and balancing synergies in a fully or highly renewable pan-European power system [J].
Rasmussen, Morten Grud ;
Andresen, Gorm Bruun ;
Greiner, Martin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 :642-651