The effect of remanence anisotropy on paleointensity estimates: a case study from the Archean Stillwater Complex

被引:132
作者
Selkin, PA [1 ]
Gee, JS
Tauxe, L
Meurer, WP
Newell, AJ
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Geol, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Geol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
paleomagnetism; paleointensity; Thellier method; anisotropy; Archean;
D O I
10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00292-2
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Paleomagnetism of Archean rocks potentially provides information about the early development of the Earth and of the geodynamo. Precambrian layered intrusive rocks are good candidates for paleomagnetic studies: such complexes are commonly relatively unaltered and may contain some single-domain magnetite 'armored' by silicate mineral grains. However, layered intrusives often have a strong petrofabric that may result in a strong remanence anisotropy. Magnetic anisotropy can have particularly disastrous consequences for paleointensity experiments if the anisotropy is unrecognized and if its effects remain uncorrected. Here we examine the magnetic anisotropy of an anorthosite sample with a well-developed magmatic foliation. The effect of the sample's remanence fabric on paleointensity determinations is significant: paleointensities estimated by the method of Thellier and Thellier range from 17 to 55 muT for specimens magnetized in a field of 25 muT. We describe a technique based on the remanence anisotropy tensor to correct paleointensity estimates for the effects of magnetic fabric and use it to estimate a paleointensity for the Stillwater Complex (MT, USA) of similar to 32 muT (adjusted for the effects of slow cooling). (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 416
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   ARCHAEOMAGNETIC DETERMINATION OF THE PAST GEOMAGNETIC INTENSITY USING ANCIENT CERAMICS - ALLOWANCE FOR ANISOTROPY [J].
AITKEN, MJ ;
ALCOCK, PA ;
BUSSELL, GD ;
SHAW, CJ .
ARCHAEOMETRY, 1981, 23 (FEB) :53-64
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data
[3]  
Bergh H.W., 1970, PALEOGEOPHYSICS, P143
[4]   PETROFABRIC ANALYSES OF RHUM AND SKAERGAARD LAYERED ROCKS [J].
BROTHERS, RN .
JOURNAL OF PETROLOGY, 1964, 5 (02) :255-274
[5]   NEW EVIDENCE FOR EXTRAORDINARILY RAPID CHANGE OF THE GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD DURING A REVERSAL [J].
COE, RS ;
PREVOT, M ;
CAMPS, P .
NATURE, 1995, 374 (6524) :687-692
[6]   DETERMINATION OF PALEO-INTENSITIES OF EARTHS MAGNETIC FIELD WITH EMPHASIS ON MECHANISMS WHICH COULD CAUSE NON-IDEAL BEHAVIOR IN THELLIERS METHOD [J].
COE, RS .
JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1967, 19 (03) :157-&
[7]   GEOMAGNETIC PALEOINTENSITIES FROM RADIOCARBON-DATED LAVA FLOWS ON HAWAII AND QUESTION OF PACIFIC NONDIPOLE LOW [J].
COE, RS ;
GROMME, S ;
MANKINEN, EA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1978, 83 (NB4) :1740-1756
[8]   EFFECT OF SHAPE ANISOTROPY ON TRM DIRECTION [J].
COE, RS .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 56 (02) :369-383
[9]  
Collinson D.W., 1983, METHODS ROCK MAGNETI
[10]   THE BOOTSTRAP FOR MAGNETIC-SUSCEPTIBILITY TENSORS [J].
CONSTABLE, C ;
TAUXE, L .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1990, 95 (B6) :8383-8395