Coordinated service provision in payment for ecosystem service schemes through adaptive governance

被引:16
作者
Cook, David C. [1 ,2 ]
Kristensen, Nadiah P. [3 ]
Liu, Shuang [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Dept Agr & Food Western Australia, POB 1231, Bunbury, WA 6231, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[4] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Payment for ecosystem services; Adaptive governance; Ecosystem services; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; LESSONS; BIODIVERSITY; RESILIENCE; CONSERVATION; POOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.01.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In this paper, we look to the adaptive governance literature for insight into how payment schemes for the provision of ecosystem services might be designed to achieve multiple socially desirable objectives over different spatial scales instead of simply focusing on localised benefits for service providers. Using the principles of adaptive governance, we explore how the concepts of lateral information flows and incentive alignment might shape ecosystem service payment schemes and allow the coordination of ecosystem service priorities across different jurisdictions. We suggest that progressing from purely anthropocentric assessments of payment schemes towards biocentric evaluations may lead to improved design principles. We discuss specific advantages of adaptive governance approaches over traditional centralised governance models related to policy-experimentation at multiple spatial scales, institutional variety and deliberative decision-making processes that establish dialogue between service providers and beneficiaries that promote group learning. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 64 条
[51]  
Pagiola S, 2002, SELLING FOREST ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, P261
[52]   Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua [J].
Pagiola, Stefano ;
Rios, Ana R. ;
Arcenas, Agustin .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2008, 13 :299-325
[53]   Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica [J].
Pagiola, Stefano .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (04) :712-724
[54]   Using a self-organizing map to predict invasive species: sensitivity to data errors and a comparison with expert opinion [J].
Paini, Dean R. ;
Worner, Susan P. ;
Cook, David C. ;
De Barro, Paul J. ;
Thomas, Matthew B. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2010, 47 (02) :290-298
[55]   Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: A lexicon [J].
Pirard, Romain .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2012, 19-20 :59-68
[56]   Deliberative multicriteria evaluation [J].
Proctor, W ;
Drechsler, M .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2006, 24 (02) :169-190
[57]   LEARNING IN AND ABOUT COMPLEX-SYSTEMS [J].
STERMAN, JD .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 1994, 10 (2-3) :291-330
[58]   Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services [J].
Turner, Will R. ;
Brandon, Katrina ;
Brooks, Thomas M. ;
Costanza, Robert ;
da Fonseca, Gustavo A. B. ;
Portela, Rosimeiry .
BIOSCIENCE, 2007, 57 (10) :868-873
[59]  
Valman M, 2015, INT J COMMONS, V9, P440
[60]   Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view [J].
Van Hecken, Gert ;
Bastiaensen, Johan .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2010, 13 (08) :785-792