Coordinated service provision in payment for ecosystem service schemes through adaptive governance

被引:16
作者
Cook, David C. [1 ,2 ]
Kristensen, Nadiah P. [3 ]
Liu, Shuang [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Dept Agr & Food Western Australia, POB 1231, Bunbury, WA 6231, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[4] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Payment for ecosystem services; Adaptive governance; Ecosystem services; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; LESSONS; BIODIVERSITY; RESILIENCE; CONSERVATION; POOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.01.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In this paper, we look to the adaptive governance literature for insight into how payment schemes for the provision of ecosystem services might be designed to achieve multiple socially desirable objectives over different spatial scales instead of simply focusing on localised benefits for service providers. Using the principles of adaptive governance, we explore how the concepts of lateral information flows and incentive alignment might shape ecosystem service payment schemes and allow the coordination of ecosystem service priorities across different jurisdictions. We suggest that progressing from purely anthropocentric assessments of payment schemes towards biocentric evaluations may lead to improved design principles. We discuss specific advantages of adaptive governance approaches over traditional centralised governance models related to policy-experimentation at multiple spatial scales, institutional variety and deliberative decision-making processes that establish dialogue between service providers and beneficiaries that promote group learning. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Alix-Garcia J., 2005, ASSESSMENT MEXICOS P
[2]  
Andrew G., 2012, J SUSTAIN DEV AFR, V12, P122
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB
[4]  
Antypas A., 2004, ENVIRON POLICY LAW, V34, P87
[5]   Cognitive and institutional perspectives of eco-efficiency [J].
Bleischwitz, R .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (03) :453-467
[6]   ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND COMMUNITIES-OF-PRACTICE: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW OF WORKING, LEARNING, AND INNOVATION [J].
Brown, John Seely ;
Duguid, Paul .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1991, 2 (01) :40-57
[7]   The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J].
Brown, SL ;
Eisenhardt, KM .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1997, 42 (01) :1-34
[8]  
Burgman M., 2006, Eliciting Expert Judgments: Literature Review: Australian Centre for Excellence in Risk Analysis (ACERA) - University of Melbourne
[9]   Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons [J].
Chhatre, Ashwini ;
Agrawal, Arun .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (42) :17667-17670
[10]   Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: Comparison of three programs from Cambodia [J].
Clements, Tom ;
John, Ashish ;
Nielsen, Karen ;
An, Dara ;
Tan, Setha ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (06) :1283-1291