Volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning based on virtual monochromatic images for head and neck cancer: effect of the contrast-enhanced agent on dose distribution

被引:4
|
作者
Komiyama, Riho [1 ]
Ohira, Shingo [1 ,2 ]
Kanayama, Naoyuki [1 ]
Karino, Tsukasa [1 ]
Washio, Hayate [1 ]
Ueda, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Miyazaki, Masayoshi [1 ]
Teshima, Teruki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Grad Sch Med, Suita, Osaka, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2019年 / 20卷 / 11期
关键词
contrast agent; dual energy CT; head and neck cancer; virtual monochromatic image; DUAL-ENERGY CT; RADIOTHERAPY; SETTINGS; IMPROVE; VOLTAGE; NUMBERS; LESION; IMRT;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12752
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) at a lower energy level can improve image quality but the computed tomography (CT) number of iodine contained in the contrast-enhanced agent is dramatically increased. We assessed the effect of the use of contrast-enhanced agent on the dose distributions in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for head and neck cancer (HNC). Based on the VMIs at 40 keV (VMI40keV), 60 keV(VMI60keV), and 77 keV (VMI77keV) of a tissue characterization phantom, lookup tables (LUTs) were created. VMAT plans were generated for 15 HNC patients based on contrast-enhanced- (CE-) VMIs at 40-, 60-, and 77 keV using the corresponding LUTs, and the doses were recalculated based on the noncontrast-enhanced- (nCE-) VMIs. For all structures, the difference in CT numbers owing to the contrast-enhanced agent was prominent as the energy level of the VMI decreased, and the mean differences in CT number between CE- and nCE-VMI was the largest for the clinical target volume (CTV) (125.3, 55.9, and 33.1 HU for VMI40keV, VMI60keV, and VMI77keV, respectively). The mean difference of the dosimetric parameters (D-99%, D-50%, D-1%, D-mean, and D-0.1cc) for CTV and OARs was <1% in the treatment plans based on all VMIs. The maximum difference was observed for CTV in VMI40keV (2.4%), VMI60keV (1.9%), and VMI77keV (1.5%) plans. The effect of the contrast-enhanced agent was larger in the VMAT plans based on the VMI at a lower energy level for HNC patients. This effect is not desirable in a treatment planning procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for Skull-Base and Non-Skull-Base Head and Neck Cancer: A Treatment Planning Comparison with Fixed Beam IMRT
    Chen, Jianzhou
    Mok, Edward
    Wang, Lilie
    Chen, Chuangzhen
    Quynh-Thu Le
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2013, 12 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [32] An efficient treatment planning approach to reduce the critical organ dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients
    Lin, Y. F.
    Shueng, P. W.
    Lin, H. H.
    Tien, H. J.
    Lai, L. H.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2020, 174
  • [33] Critical Appraisal of the Treatment Planning Performance of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy by Means of a Dual Layer Stacked Multileaf Collimator for Head and Neck, Breast, and Prostate
    Cozzi, Luca
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Thompson, Stephen
    Franzese, Ciro
    Franceschini, Davide
    de Rose, Fiorenza
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Scorsetti, Marta
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2018, 17 : 1 - 11
  • [34] Image guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer: A comparative analysis of dosimetry for target volume and organs at risk
    Akiyama, Hironori
    Pesznyak, Csilla
    Bela, Dalma
    Ferenczi, Ors
    Major, Tibor
    Polgar, Csaba
    Takacsi-Nagy, Zoltan
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 52 (04) : 461 - 467
  • [35] Evaluation of Conformity and Homogeneity Indices Consistency Throughout the Course of Head and Neck Cancer Treatment With and Without Using Adaptive Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiation Therapy
    Al-Rawi, Salam Abdulrazzaq Ibrahim
    Abouelenein, Hassan
    Khalil, Magdy Mohammed
    Alabdei, Haidar Hamza
    Sulaiman, Awf Abdulrahman
    Al-Nuaimi, Dalya Saad
    El Nagdy, Mohamed El-Sayed
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 7 (05)
  • [36] Comparison of biologically effective dose for treatment planning in the fixed-beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy and the volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the typical types of cancer
    Wang, Shichao
    Zhou, Lin
    Xue, Jianxin
    Lan, Jie
    Deng, Lei
    Yi, Tingwu
    Lu, You
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2019, 157 : 102 - 108
  • [37] Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive 18F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer
    Berwouts, Dieter
    Olteanu, Luiza Ana Maria
    Speleers, Bruno
    Duprez, Frederic
    Madani, Indira
    Vercauteren, Tom
    De Neve, Wilfried
    De Gersem, Werner
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11
  • [38] The feasibility of direct treatment planning via contrast-enhanced computed tomography: an evaluation of dose differences based on the dimensional dose distribution comparison method
    Li, Y.
    Sun, X.
    Wang, Q.
    Zhou, Q.
    Gu, B.
    Liu, H.
    Shi, G.
    Jiang, D.
    Niu, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2017, 15 (02): : 167 - 175
  • [39] Influence of computed tomography contrast agent on radiotherapy dose calculation for pancreatic carcinoma: A dosimetric study based on tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques
    Zhu, Feng
    Wu, Weizhang
    Zhu, Fuhai
    Wang, Yong
    Wang, Yingjie
    Xia, Tingyi
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (04) : 317 - 325
  • [40] Comparison between hypo-fractionated dose-escalated volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional concurrent chemo-radiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a pilot study
    Saad, Ehab
    Radwan, Riham Hani
    Hadi, Eman Abdel
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2020, 19 (02) : 132 - 138