Volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning based on virtual monochromatic images for head and neck cancer: effect of the contrast-enhanced agent on dose distribution

被引:4
|
作者
Komiyama, Riho [1 ]
Ohira, Shingo [1 ,2 ]
Kanayama, Naoyuki [1 ]
Karino, Tsukasa [1 ]
Washio, Hayate [1 ]
Ueda, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Miyazaki, Masayoshi [1 ]
Teshima, Teruki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Grad Sch Med, Suita, Osaka, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2019年 / 20卷 / 11期
关键词
contrast agent; dual energy CT; head and neck cancer; virtual monochromatic image; DUAL-ENERGY CT; RADIOTHERAPY; SETTINGS; IMPROVE; VOLTAGE; NUMBERS; LESION; IMRT;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12752
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) at a lower energy level can improve image quality but the computed tomography (CT) number of iodine contained in the contrast-enhanced agent is dramatically increased. We assessed the effect of the use of contrast-enhanced agent on the dose distributions in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for head and neck cancer (HNC). Based on the VMIs at 40 keV (VMI40keV), 60 keV(VMI60keV), and 77 keV (VMI77keV) of a tissue characterization phantom, lookup tables (LUTs) were created. VMAT plans were generated for 15 HNC patients based on contrast-enhanced- (CE-) VMIs at 40-, 60-, and 77 keV using the corresponding LUTs, and the doses were recalculated based on the noncontrast-enhanced- (nCE-) VMIs. For all structures, the difference in CT numbers owing to the contrast-enhanced agent was prominent as the energy level of the VMI decreased, and the mean differences in CT number between CE- and nCE-VMI was the largest for the clinical target volume (CTV) (125.3, 55.9, and 33.1 HU for VMI40keV, VMI60keV, and VMI77keV, respectively). The mean difference of the dosimetric parameters (D-99%, D-50%, D-1%, D-mean, and D-0.1cc) for CTV and OARs was <1% in the treatment plans based on all VMIs. The maximum difference was observed for CTV in VMI40keV (2.4%), VMI60keV (1.9%), and VMI77keV (1.5%) plans. The effect of the contrast-enhanced agent was larger in the VMAT plans based on the VMI at a lower energy level for HNC patients. This effect is not desirable in a treatment planning procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] Skin dose differences between intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy and between boost and integrated treatment regimens for treating head and neck and other cancer sites in patients
    Penoncello, Gregory P.
    Ding, George X.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2016, 41 (01) : 80 - 86
  • [22] Evaluation of the trade-offs encountered in planning and treating locally advanced head and neck cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy vs dual-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Oliver, M.
    McConnell, D.
    Romani, M.
    McAllister, A.
    Pearce, A.
    Andronowski, A.
    Wang, X.
    Leszczynski, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1020) : 1539 - 1545
  • [23] Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy dose measurement for head and neck cancer using optical stimulated luminescence dosimeter
    Lai, Lu-Han
    Chuang, Keh-Shih
    Lin, Hsin-Hon
    Liu, Yi-Chi
    Kuo, Chiung-Wen
    Lin, Jao-Perng
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 140 : 266 - 270
  • [24] Multi-institutional comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a planning study
    Andrea Holt
    Dirk Van Gestel
    Mark P Arends
    Erik W Korevaar
    Danny Schuring
    Martina C Kunze-Busch
    Rob JW Louwe
    Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij
    Radiation Oncology, 8
  • [25] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy vs 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer: a Comparative Planning and Dosimetry Study
    Lee, S. M.
    Lee, C. K.
    Yu, K. S.
    Ngan, K. C.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 15 (03): : 149 - 154
  • [26] An experience with simultaneous integrated boost-volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the definitive treatment of head and neck cancer: An Indian data
    Shivananjappa, Rashmi
    Mandal, Sanjeet Kumar
    Vishwanathan, Bhaskar
    Geeta, S. N.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (02) : 283 - 288
  • [27] THE EFFECT OF SIGNIFICANT TUMOR REDUCTION ON THE DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER: A CASE STUDY
    Mechalakos, James
    Lee, Nancy
    Hunt, Margie
    Ling, C. Clifton
    Amols, Howard I.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2009, 34 (03) : 250 - 255
  • [28] Dose-volume Histogram Analysis of Knowledge-based Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Planning in Postoperative Breast Cancer Irradiation
    Inoue, Eri
    Doi, Hiroshi
    Monzen, Hajime
    Tamura, Mikoto
    Inada, Masahiro
    Ishikawa, Kazuki
    Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi
    Nishimura, Yasumasa
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (03): : 1095 - 1101
  • [29] A treatment planning and delivery comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with or without flattening filter for gliomas, brain metastases, prostate, head/neck and early stage lung cancer
    Gasic, Daniel
    Ohlhues, Lars
    Brodin, N. Patrik
    Fog, Lotte S.
    Pommer, Tobias
    Bangsgaard, Jens P.
    Rosenschold, Per Munck A. F.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2014, 53 (08) : 1005 - 1011
  • [30] Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and simultaneous integrated boost in head-and-neck cancer: is there a place for critical swallowing structures dose sparing?
    Cilla, Savino
    Deodato, Francesco
    Macchia, Gabriella
    Digesu, Cinzia
    Ianiro, Anna
    Piermattei, Angelo
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Morganti, Alessio G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1059)