Volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning based on virtual monochromatic images for head and neck cancer: effect of the contrast-enhanced agent on dose distribution

被引:4
|
作者
Komiyama, Riho [1 ]
Ohira, Shingo [1 ,2 ]
Kanayama, Naoyuki [1 ]
Karino, Tsukasa [1 ]
Washio, Hayate [1 ]
Ueda, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Miyazaki, Masayoshi [1 ]
Teshima, Teruki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Grad Sch Med, Suita, Osaka, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2019年 / 20卷 / 11期
关键词
contrast agent; dual energy CT; head and neck cancer; virtual monochromatic image; DUAL-ENERGY CT; RADIOTHERAPY; SETTINGS; IMPROVE; VOLTAGE; NUMBERS; LESION; IMRT;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12752
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) at a lower energy level can improve image quality but the computed tomography (CT) number of iodine contained in the contrast-enhanced agent is dramatically increased. We assessed the effect of the use of contrast-enhanced agent on the dose distributions in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for head and neck cancer (HNC). Based on the VMIs at 40 keV (VMI40keV), 60 keV(VMI60keV), and 77 keV (VMI77keV) of a tissue characterization phantom, lookup tables (LUTs) were created. VMAT plans were generated for 15 HNC patients based on contrast-enhanced- (CE-) VMIs at 40-, 60-, and 77 keV using the corresponding LUTs, and the doses were recalculated based on the noncontrast-enhanced- (nCE-) VMIs. For all structures, the difference in CT numbers owing to the contrast-enhanced agent was prominent as the energy level of the VMI decreased, and the mean differences in CT number between CE- and nCE-VMI was the largest for the clinical target volume (CTV) (125.3, 55.9, and 33.1 HU for VMI40keV, VMI60keV, and VMI77keV, respectively). The mean difference of the dosimetric parameters (D-99%, D-50%, D-1%, D-mean, and D-0.1cc) for CTV and OARs was <1% in the treatment plans based on all VMIs. The maximum difference was observed for CTV in VMI40keV (2.4%), VMI60keV (1.9%), and VMI77keV (1.5%) plans. The effect of the contrast-enhanced agent was larger in the VMAT plans based on the VMI at a lower energy level for HNC patients. This effect is not desirable in a treatment planning procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [11] Knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning for breast cancer
    Apaza Blanco, Oscar
    Almada, Maria
    Garcia Andino, Albin
    Zunino, Silvia
    Venencia, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 46 (04) : 334 - 340
  • [12] Comparison of skin dose of flattening filter and flattening filter-free beam in volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plan for head and neck cancer
    Lam Pham Hong
    Dung Phan Tien
    Thai Hoang Huu
    Lam Nguyen Tung
    Tu Nguyen Duong
    Van Anh Nguyen Thi
    Trang Pham Quang
    2023 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ICHST 2023, 2023,
  • [13] The effect of bladder contrast on dose calculation in volumetric modulated arc therapy planning in patients treated for postoperative prostate cancer
    Tülay Ercan
    Şefik İğdem
    Gül Alço
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2016, 34 : 376 - 382
  • [14] Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculations of intensity modulated radiation therapy plans for head and neck cancer
    Choi, Youngmin
    Kim, Jeung-Kee
    Lee, Hyung-Sik
    Hur, Won-Joo
    Hong, Young-Seoub
    Park, Sungkwang
    Ahn, Kijung
    Cho, Heunglae
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 (02) : 158 - 162
  • [15] Maintaining dosimetric quality when switching to a Monte Carlo dose engine for head and neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning
    Feygelman, Vladimir
    Latifi, Kujtim
    Bowers, Mark
    Greco, Kevin
    Moros, Eduardo G.
    Isacson, Max
    Angerud, Agnes
    Caudell, Jimmy
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (05):
  • [16] The effect of intravenous contrast on intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose calculations for head and neck cancer
    Liauw, SL
    Amdur, RJ
    Mendenhall, WM
    Palta, J
    Kim, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (05): : 456 - 459
  • [17] A Model-Based Method for Assessment of Salivary Gland and Planning Target Volume Dosimetry in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Planning on Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Zhang, Honglai
    Cao, Yijian
    Antone, Jeffrey
    Riegel, Adam C.
    Ghaly, Maged
    Potters, Louis
    Jamshidi, Abolghassem
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 44 (03) : 201 - 206
  • [18] Multi-institutional comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a planning study
    Holt, Andrea
    Van Gestel, Dirk
    Arends, Mark P.
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Schuring, Danny
    Kunze-Busch, Martina C.
    Louwe, Rob J. W.
    van Vliet-Vroegindeweij, Corine
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [19] Dose distribution comparison in volumetric- modulated arc therapy plans for head and neck cancers with and without an external body contour extended technique
    Tanaka, Yoshihiro
    Monzen, Hajime
    Matsumoto, Kenji
    Inomata, Shinichiro
    Fuse, Toshiaki
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2019, 24 (06) : 576 - 584
  • [20] VOLUMETRIC INTENSITY-MODULATED ARC THERAPY VS. CONVENTIONAL IMRT IN HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER: A COMPARATIVE PLANNING AND DOSIMETRIC STUDY
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    Cuijpers, Johan P.
    Hoffmans, Daan
    Bieker, Michael
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Senan, Suresh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (01): : 252 - 259