The influence of brachytherapy dose heterogeneity on estimates of α/β for prostate cancer

被引:22
作者
Lindsay, PE [1 ]
Moiseenko, VV [1 ]
Van Dyk, J [1 ]
Battista, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] London Reg Canc Ctr, Radiat Oncol Program, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/48/4/307
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The sensitivity of estimates of alpha/beta for prostate tumours to dose heterogeneity in I-125 brachytherapy implants, as well as to variation in selected radiobiological parameters, is analysed. The tumour control probabilities of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy are equated for ranges of alpha, T-pot, RBE and external beam dose. For each combination of parameters, the equality is used to derive the value of cell. Different clinical (non-uniform) brachytherapy dose distributions, and three uniform brachytherapy dose distributions (120, 144 and 160 Gy) are used. For 'nominal' input parameter values of T-pot = 45 days, a = 0.2 Gy(-1), RBE = 1.4, and an external beam dose of 70 Gy, the values obtained for alpha/beta ranged between 2.1 and 12.3 Gy for all of the clinical DVHs, between 2.1 and 3.8 Gy for the better quality clinical implants and between 1.0 and 1.8 Gy for the uniform brachytherapy doses. When only 2% of the volume receiving the lowest dose is omitted from the clinical DVHs, the estimated alpha/beta values ranged between 1.4 and 2.1 Gy. When ranges of input parameters were also considered, the overall range of alpha/beta values for the clinical brachytherapy dose distributions lay between 1.1 and 12.3 Gy for the three best clinical implants, and between 0.7 and 6.3 Gy for uniform doses. We conclude that estimation of alpha/beta without taking into account dose heterogeneity and inter-patient variation may underestimate the actual value alpha/beta.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 522
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A theoretical investigation into the role of tumour radiosensitivity, clonogen repopulation, tumour shrinkage and radionuclide RBE in permanent brachytherapy implants of 125I and 103Pd [J].
Antipas, V ;
Dale, RG ;
Coles, IP .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (10) :2557-2569
[2]   In response to Drs. King and Mayo:: Low α/β values for prostate appear to be independent of modeling details [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Hall, EJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 47 (02) :538-539
[3]  
Brenner DJ, 2002, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V52, P6
[4]   Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Hall, EJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (05) :1095-1101
[5]  
Chen ME, 2000, CANCER, V89, P1800, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1800::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-D
[7]   Is the α/β ratio for prostate cancer low? [J].
D'Souza, WD ;
Thames, HD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (01) :1-3
[8]   Is the α/β for prostate tumors really low?: In regard to Fowler et al., IJROBP 2001;50:1021-1031 [J].
Dale, RG ;
Jones, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (05) :1427-1428
[10]   The clinical radiobiology of brachytherapy [J].
Dale, RG ;
Jones, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (845) :465-483