Effectiveness of Population-Based Service Screening With Mammography for Women Ages 40 to 49 Years With a High or Low Risk of Breast Cancer: Socioeconomic Status, Parity, and Age at Birth of First Child

被引:28
作者
Hellquist, Barbro Numan [1 ]
Czene, Kamila [2 ]
Hjalm, Anna [3 ]
Nystrom, Lennarth [4 ]
Jonsson, Hakan [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Radiat Sci, S-90185 Umea, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Dept Geog & Econ Hist, Ctr Populat Studies, Ageing & Living Condit Programme, S-90185 Umea, Sweden
[4] Umea Univ, Div Epidemiol & Global Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, S-90185 Umea, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
mammography; cancer screening; breast cancer; mortality; risk factors; socioeconomic status (SES); parity; METAANALYSIS; SURVIVAL; INEQUALITIES; MORTALITY; COUNTRIES; HEALTH; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.29011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDInvitation to mammography screening of women aged 40 to 49 years is a matter of debate in many countries and a cost-effective alternative in countries without screening among women aged 40 to 49 years could be inviting those at higher risk. The relative effectiveness of mammography screening was estimated for subgroups based on the breast cancer risk factors parity, age at time of birth of first child, and socioeconomic status (SES). METHODSThe SCReening of Young Women (SCRY) database consists of all women aged 40 to 49 years in Sweden between 1986 and 2005 and was split into a study and control group. The study group consisted of women residing in areas in which women aged 40 to 49 years were invited to screening and the control group of women in areas in which women aged 40 to 49 years were not invited to screening. Rate ratio (RR) estimates were calculated for 2 exposures: invitation and attendance. RESULTSThere were striking similarities noted in the RR pattern for women invited to and attending screening and no statistically significant difference or trend in the RR was noted by risk group. The RR estimates increased by increasing parity for parity of 0 to 2 and ranged from 0.55 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.38-0.79) to 0.79 (95% CI, 0.65-0.95) for attending women. The RR for women with high SES was lower than that for women with low SES (RR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.60-0.86] and RR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.63-0.99], respectively). For women aged 20 to 24 years at the time of the birth of their first child, the RR was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.91) and estimates for other ages were similar. CONCLUSIONSThere was no statistically significant difference noted in the relative effectiveness of mammography screening by parity, age at the time of birth of the first child, or SES. Cancer 2015;121:251-8. (c) 2014 American Cancer Society. The invitation to mammography screening of women aged 40 to 49 years is an issue of debate in many countries and a cost-effective alternative in those countries without screening among these women could be inviting only those women at higher risk. For the 3 risk factors in the current study, the relative effectiveness for the high-risk groups was found to be the same as or higher than that of the low-risk groups, indicating that screening of high-risk groups (eg, nulliparous women) may be an alternative.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 258
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[2]   Education and risk of breast cancer in the Norwegian-Swedish women's lifestyle and health cohort study [J].
Bratten, T ;
Weiderpass, E ;
Kumle, M ;
Adami, HO ;
Lund, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 110 (04) :579-583
[3]   Parity in relation to survival following breast cancer [J].
Butt, S. ;
Borgquist, S. ;
Garne, J. P. ;
Landberg, G. ;
Tengrup, I. ;
Olsson, A. ;
Manjer, J. .
EJSO, 2009, 35 (07) :702-708
[4]   Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Calonge, Ned ;
Petitti, Diana B. ;
DeWitt, Thomas G. ;
Dietrich, Allen J. ;
Gregory, Kimberly D. ;
Grossman, David ;
Isham, George ;
LeFevre, Michael L. ;
Leipzig, Rosanne M. ;
Marion, Lucy N. ;
Melnyk, Bernadette ;
Moyer, Virginia A. ;
Ockene, Judith K. ;
Sawaya, George F. ;
Schwartz, J. Sanford ;
Wilt, Timothy .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (10) :716-W236
[5]   Social inequality and incidence of and survival from breast cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994-2003 [J].
Carlsen, Kathrine ;
Hoybye, Mette Terp ;
Dalton, Susanne Oksbjery ;
Tjonneland, Anne .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (14) :1996-2002
[6]  
Cuzick J, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P1017, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<1017::AID-SIM508>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-V
[8]   AGE AT 1ST BIRTH, PARITY AND RISK OF BREAST-CANCER - A METAANALYSIS OF 8 STUDIES FROM THE NORDIC COUNTRIES [J].
EWERTZ, M ;
DUFFY, SW ;
ADAMI, HO ;
KVALE, G ;
LUND, E ;
MEIRIK, O ;
MELLEMGAARD, A ;
SOINI, I ;
TULINIUS, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 46 (04) :597-603
[9]   Does birth history account for educational differences in breast cancer mortality? A comparison of premenopausal and postmenopausal women in Belgium [J].
Gadeyne, Sylvie ;
Deboosere, Patrick ;
Vandenheede, Hadewijch ;
Neels, Karel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 131 (12) :2878-2885
[10]   Fertility history and cause-specific mortality: A register-based analysis of complete cohorts of Norwegian women and men [J].
Grundy, Emily ;
Kravdal, Oystein .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2010, 70 (11) :1847-1857