Perioperative blood transfusion in gynecologic oncology surgery: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

被引:55
|
作者
Prescott, Lauren S. [1 ]
Aloia, Thomas A. [2 ]
Brown, Alaina J. [1 ]
Taylor, Jolyn S. [1 ]
Munsell, Mark F. [3 ]
Sun, Charlotte C. [1 ]
Schmeler, Kathleen M. [1 ]
Levenback, Charles F. [1 ]
Bodurka, Diane C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX 77230 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77230 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77230 USA
关键词
Transfusion; Blood utilization; NSQIP; Gynecologic oncology; Perioperative outcomes; CELL TRANSFUSION; CANCER-SURGERY; INTRAOPERATIVE TRANSFUSION; RESTRICTIVE TRANSFUSION; OUTCOMES; ANEMIA; SURVIVAL; RADIOTHERAPY; ASSOCIATION; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To use a large-scale multi-institutional dataset to quantify the prevalence of packed red blood cell transfusions and examine the associations between transfusion and perioperative outcomes in gynecologic cancer surgery. Methods. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) participant use file was queried for all gynecologic cancer cases between 2010 and 2012. Demographic, preoperative and intraoperative variables were compared between transfusion and non-transfusion groups using chi-squared, Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. The primary endpoint was 30-day composite morbidity. Secondary endpoints included composite surgical site infections, mortality and length of stay. Results. A total of 8519 patients were analyzed, and 13.8% received a packed red blood cell transfusion. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for key clinical and perioperative factors, including preoperative anemia and case magnitude, transfusion was associated with higher composite morbidity (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.5-224), surgical site infections (OR 1.80,95% CI 139-2.35), mortality (OR 338, 95% Cl 1.80-636) and length of hospital stay (3.02 days v. 7.17 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions. Blood transfusions are associated with increased surgical wound infections, composite morbidity and mortality. Based on our analysis of the NSQIP database, transfusion practices in gynecologic cancer should be scrutinized. Examination of institutional practices and creation of transfusion guidelines for gynecologic malignancies could potentially result in better utilization of blood bank resources and clinical outcomes among patients. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 70
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perioperative blood transfusion in radical cystectomy: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database
    Sui, Wilson
    Onyeji, Ifeanyi C.
    Matulay, Justin T.
    James, Maxwell B.
    Theofanides, Marissa C.
    Wenske, Sven
    DeCastro, Guarionex J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (09) : 745 - 750
  • [2] Editorial Comment to Perioperative blood transfusion in radical cystectomy: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (09) : 750 - 751
  • [3] Adverse postoperative outcomes associated with perioperative blood transfusion in gynecologic oncology surgery
    Swift, Brenna E.
    Maeda, Azusa
    Bouchard-Fortier, Genevieve
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 (04) : 585 - 591
  • [4] The impact of blood transfusion on perioperative outcomes following gastric cancer resection: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database
    Elmi, Maryam
    Mahar, Alyson
    Kagedan, Daniel
    Law, Calvin H. L.
    Karanicolas, Paul J.
    Lin, Yulia
    Callum, Jeannie
    Coburn, Natalie G.
    Hallet, Julie
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 59 (05) : 322 - 329
  • [5] Morbidity and Mortality Risk Assessment in Gynecologic Oncology Surgery Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Kohut, Adrian
    Orfanelli, Theofano
    Poggio, Juan Lucas
    Gibbon, Darlene
    De Meritens, Alexandre Buckley
    Richard, Scott
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 (04) : 840 - 847
  • [6] Blood Transfusion in Major Abdominal Surgery for Malignant Tumors A Trend Analysis Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Ecker, Brett L.
    Simmons, Kristina D.
    Zaheer, Salman
    Poe, Sarah-Lucy C.
    Bartlett, Edmund K.
    Drebin, Jeffrey A.
    Fraker, Douglas L.
    Kelz, Rachel R.
    Roses, Robert E.
    Karakousis, Giorgos C.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2016, 151 (06) : 518 - 525
  • [7] An Assessment of Bleeding Complications Necessitating Blood Transfusion across Inpatient Plastic Surgery Procedures: A Nationwide Analysis Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Thomas, Analise B.
    Shammas, Ronnie L.
    Orr, Jonah
    Truong, Tracy
    Kuchibhatla, Maragatha
    Sergesketter, Amanda R.
    Hollenbeck, Scott T.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (05) : 1109E - 1117E
  • [8] Quality improvement in gastrointestinal surgical oncology with American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Lucas, Donald J.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    SURGERY, 2014, 155 (04) : 593 - 601
  • [9] Labiaplasty: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Wells, Michael W.
    Chang, Irene A.
    Wu, Robin T.
    Zheng, David X.
    Gatherwright, James R.
    Furnas, Heather J.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2022, 42 (07) : 771 - 780
  • [10] Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Teoh, Deanna
    Halloway, Rebi Nahum
    Heim, Jennifer
    Vogel, Rachel Isaksson
    Rivard, Colleen
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (01) : 48 - 54