British general practitioners' attitudes toward abortion

被引:19
作者
Francome, C [1 ]
Freeman, E
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, London N17 8HR, England
[2] Marie Stopes Int, London, England
来源
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES | 2000年 / 32卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2648236
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Context: Women in Great Britain may obtain abortions only if they meet certain criteria and the procedure is approved by two physicians. Since seeing a general practitioner is typically a woman's first step toward obtaining an abortion, these doctors' attitudes about the procedure are very important Methods: In 1999, a random sample of 702 general practitioners participated in a mailed survey regarding their attitudes toward abortion and the British Abortion Act. Results: Four in five respondents considered themselves broadly prochoice, and three in five believed that the current law should be liberalized to give women the right to obtain an abortion without regard as to reason. Three-quarters of doctors favored government provision of free abortions, and one-quarter thought that the current law places an unreasonable burden on general practitioners. However, physicians' opinions about whether the abortion decision should be the woman's alone depended on the pregnancy's gestation, and three-fifths of respondents said that the law was appropriate. Among doctors who were broadly antiabortion, one-fifth favored women's right to choose, and two-thirds supported the current law; however, nearly half opposed government funding of abortion services, and one-quarter did not feel that physicians need to reveal their antiabortion stance to patients. Conclusions: Although Great Britain's abortion law is more restrictive than those in many other developed countries, general practitioners have largely positive attitudes toward women's access to abortion and toward the existing law. Their occasionally contradictory views, however, suggest that some areas are potentially problematic.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 191
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] BUCK PS, 1968, TERRIBLE CHOICE
  • [2] FRANCOME C, 1984, ABORTION FREEDOM
  • [3] FRANCOME C, 1996, IMPROVING HLTH NATIO
  • [4] Hindell Keith, 1971, ABORTION LAW REFORME
  • [5] MCGOVERN M, 2000, COMMUNICATION APR
  • [6] *OFF NAT STAT, 1999, AB STAT 1998
  • [7] ROE J, 2000, COMMUNICATION 0608
  • [8] ABORTIONS IN RURAL IDAHO - PHYSICIANS ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES
    ROSENBLATT, RA
    MATTIS, R
    HART, GL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (10) : 1423 - 1425
  • [9] WESTFALL JM, 1991, J FAM PRACTICE, V33, P47