A framework for assessing the Ecological Sustainability of Waste Disposal Sites (EcoSWaD)

被引:8
作者
Aryampa, Shamim [1 ,2 ]
Maheshwari, Basant [1 ]
Sabiiti, Elly N. [2 ]
Zamorano, Montserrat [3 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Sci & Hlth, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] Makerere Univ, Sch Agr Sci, POB 7062, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Univ Granada, ETSI Caminos Canales & Puertos, Dept Ingn Civil, Granada 18071, Spain
关键词
Ecological sustainability; Waste disposal sites; Sustainability assessment; EcoSWaD; Waste management; Kiteezi landfill; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; ENVIRONMENTAL DIAGNOSIS; EVIAVE METHODOLOGY; LANDFILLS; IMPACT; GENERATION; MANAGEMENT; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.044
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although the need for sustainability of waste disposal sites (WDS) is largely agreed upon by various stakeholders, there is still a limitation in evaluating sites' sustainability. This study aimed to define ecological sustainability for WDS and develop a framework for its assessment. A WDS's ecological sustain ability was defined as the site's capacity to take up waste without compromising the surrounding ecosystems' health and their abilities to self-regenerate or provide other ecosystem services. A model, called EcoSWaD, was developed in this study to assess the ecological sustainability of WDS. The model has 35 indicators divided into five major themes: (i) location suitability; (ii) operational sustainability; (iii) environmental sustainability; (iv) socioeconomic sustainability; and (v) site capacity sustainability. The EcoSWaD brought together all the different interpretations and indicators in the diverse fields of sustainability study or practice to facilitate a comprehensive and meaningful WDS assessment. Testing the model at the Kiteezi landfill showed that the location, environmental, socioeconomic and site capacity themes at the landfill had low values: 18.7, 19.1, 16.9 and 15, respectively. The operation theme had a very low value of 13.5, showing that the landfill's biggest sustainability concerns stem from site operation and the resultant impact on the environment, local community and site capacity. The overall Sustainability Score of 83.1 showed that the landfill's sustainability is low. A tool for the application of the EcoSWaD can be found at https://ecoswad.org/app/console/. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 20
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Ampim-Darko K.A., 2013, SUSTAINABILITY SANIT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, WORLD APPL SCI J, DOI DOI 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.11.1794
[3]   Adaptation of EVIAVE methodology for monitoring and follow-up when evaluating the environmental impact of landfills [J].
Arrieta, Gabriela ;
Requena, Ignacio ;
Toro, Javier ;
Zamorano, Montserrat .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2016, 56 :168-179
[4]   Status of Waste Management in the East African Cities: Understanding the Drivers of Waste Generation, Collection and Disposal and Their Impacts on Kampala City's Sustainability [J].
Aryampa, Shamim ;
Maheshwari, Basant ;
Sabiiti, Elly ;
Bateganya, Najib L. ;
Bukenya, Brian .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
[5]  
Basamba A.T.A., 2011, INT J ENV ENG, V3, P371
[6]  
Fiksel J., 2012, FRAMEWORK SUSTAINABI
[7]   Designing a framework for municipal solid waste management towards sustainability in emerging economy countries - An application to a case study in Belo Horizonte (Brazil) [J].
Fuss, Maryegli ;
Vasconcelos Barros, Raphael Tobias ;
Poganietz, Witold-Roger .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 178 :655-664
[8]   The Circular Economy A new sustainability paradigm? [J].
Geissdoerfer, Martin ;
Savaget, Paulo ;
Bocken, Nancy M. P. ;
Hultink, Erik Jan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 :757-768
[9]  
Godfrey L., 2001, Defining Thresholds for Freshwater Sustainability Indicators within the Context of South African Water Resource Management, V2nd
[10]  
Gutberlet J., 2018, URBAN AGGLOMERATION, DOI DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.72047