Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: recent advances and future perspectives

被引:218
作者
Jimenez-Luna, Jose [1 ]
Grisoni, Francesca [1 ]
Weskamp, Nils [2 ]
Schneider, Gisbert [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Chem & Appl Biosci, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Biberach, Germany
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Drug discovery; artificial intelligence; QSAR; de novo drug design; synthesis prediction; SCORING FUNCTIONS; BINDING-AFFINITY; MOLECULAR DESIGN; CROSS-VALIDATION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; PREDICTION; LIBRARIES; QSAR; DATABASE; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1080/17460441.2021.1909567
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has inspired computer-aided drug discovery. The widespread adoption of machine learning, in particular deep learning, in multiple scientific disciplines, and the advances in computing hardware and software, among other factors, continue to fuel this development. Much of the initial skepticism regarding applications of AI in pharmaceutical discovery has started to vanish, consequently benefitting medicinal chemistry. Areas covered: The current status of AI in chemoinformatics is reviewed. The topics discussed herein include quantitative structure-activity/property relationship and structure-based modeling, de novo molecular design, and chemical synthesis prediction. Advantages and limitations of current deep learning applications are highlighted, together with a perspective on next-generation AI for drug discovery. Expert opinion: Deep learning-based approaches have only begun to address some fundamental problems in drug discovery. Certain methodological advances, such as message-passing models, spatial-symmetry-preserving networks, hybrid de novo design, and other innovative machine learning paradigms, will likely become commonplace and help address some of the most challenging questions. Open data sharing and model development will play a central role in the advancement of drug discovery with AI.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 959
页数:11
相关论文
共 191 条
[1]   Machine-learning scoring functions to improve structure-based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening [J].
Ain, Qurrat Ul ;
Aleksandrova, Antoniya ;
Roessler, Florian D. ;
Ballester, Pedro J. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE, 2015, 5 (06) :405-424
[2]   Beware of R2: Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models [J].
Alexander, D. L. J. ;
Tropsha, A. ;
Winkler, David A. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2015, 55 (07) :1316-1322
[3]   Low Data Drug Discovery with One-Shot Learning [J].
Altae-Tran, Han ;
Ramsundar, Bharath ;
Pappu, Aneesh S. ;
Pande, Vijay .
ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE, 2017, 3 (04) :283-293
[4]   QSAR-Co: An Open Source Software for Developing Robust Multitasking or Multitarget Classification-Based QSAR Models [J].
Ambure, Pravin ;
Halder, Amit Kumar ;
Gonzalez Diaz, Humbert ;
Cordeiro, M. Natalia D. S. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2019, 59 (06) :2538-2544
[5]  
Anderson B, 2019, ADV NEUR IN, V32
[6]  
Nguyen A, 2015, PROC CVPR IEEE, P427, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298640
[7]  
Bacciu D., 2020, EXPLAINING DEEP GRAP
[8]   Multivariate comparison of classification performance measures [J].
Ballabio, Davide ;
Grisoni, Francesca ;
Todeschini, Roberto .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2018, 174 :33-44
[9]  
Ballester Pedro J, 2019, Drug Discov Today Technol, V32-33, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.09.001
[10]   A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking [J].
Ballester, Pedro J. ;
Mitchell, John B. O. .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 26 (09) :1169-1175