Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 prostatic adenocarcinoma

被引:8
|
作者
Pokala, Naveen [1 ]
Trulson, Jerry J. [1 ]
Islam, Majdee [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Div Urol, Columbia, MO 65203 USA
关键词
Prostatic neoplasm/surgery; Prostatic neoplasms/pathology; Treatment outcome; Survival analysis; SEER database; COMPETING RISK ANALYSIS; CANCER; SURVIVAL; MEN; PREDICTOR; PROGNOSIS; THERAPY; MARGINS; CAPSURE; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-014-1253-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Compared to low-grade disease, high-grade prostate cancers exhibit a higher rate of disease progression. As a result, there has been a trend to treat high-risk disease with methods other than surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term survival following radical prostatectomy (RRP) for non-metastatic Gleason 8-10 prostate adenocarcinoma (CaP). All patients 75 years or less with Gleason 8-10 CaP that underwent RRP were identified from the SEER 18 database. Patients with metastatic disease, those who underwent other modalities of treatment, or with more than one primary cancer, were excluded. Data were analyzed for demographics, stage at presentation, treatment modality, and overall survival and cancer-specific survival. A total of 30,379 men met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62.5 years and 82.5 % of patients were white. A total of 52.8 % of patients had T2 disease, and 73.1 % had node-negative disease, 80.2 % of patients underwent pelvic lymph node dissection, and 12.9 % underwent adjuvant radiation therapy. Overall survival for the entire cohort was 92.8, 78.6, 59.5, 38.6, and 20.0 % for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively. Cancer-specific survival was 96.4, 89.5, 82.0, 72.9, and 68.8 % for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively. Although historically underutilized in patients with poorly differentiated disease, radical prostatectomy provides excellent long-term survival and should be offered to healthy patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1385 / 1392
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8–10 prostatic adenocarcinoma
    Naveen Pokala
    Jerry J. Trulson
    Majdee Islam
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 1385 - 1392
  • [2] Biopsy characteristics in men with a preoperative diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma with high Gleason score (8-10) predict pathologic outcome in radical prostatectomy
    Brimo, Fadi
    Xu, Bin
    Scarlata, Eleonora
    Begin, Louis R.
    Spatz, Alan
    Salomon, Laurent
    Zakaria, Ahmed S.
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Bladou, Frank
    Kassouf, Wassim
    Tanguay, Simon
    Chevalier, Simone
    Ye, Huihui
    Aprikian, Armen
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 45 (10) : 2006 - 2013
  • [3] Long-term outcome in patients with a Gleason score ≤6 prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy
    Birkhahn, Marc
    Penson, David F.
    Cai, Jie
    Groshen, Susan
    Stein, John P.
    Lieskovsky, Gary
    Skinner, Donald G.
    Cote, Richard J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (05) : 660 - 664
  • [4] Predictive Factors and Oncologic Outcome of Downgrade to Pathologic Gleason Score 6-7 after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 8-10
    Chung, Doo Yong
    Lee, Jong Soo
    Goh, Hyeok Jun
    Koh, Dong Hoon
    Kim, Min Seok
    Jang, Won Sik
    Choi, Young Deuk
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (04)
  • [5] Long-term Survival After Radical Prostatectomy for Men With High Gleason Sum in Pathologic Specimen
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    Han, Misop
    Bivalacqua, Trinity J.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Schoenberg, Mark
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Partin, Alan W.
    UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (03) : 715 - 721
  • [6] Prognostic significance of percentage Gleason grade 5 prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies from patients treated by radical prostatectomy
    Yaxley, William
    Delahunt, Brett
    Yaxley, John
    Thundeer, Michelle C.
    Kenwright, Diane N.
    Egevad, Lars
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    PATHOLOGY, 2022, 54 (06) : 694 - 699
  • [7] Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone
    Mian, BM
    Troncoso, P
    Okihara, K
    Bhadkamkar, V
    Johnston, D
    Reyes, AO
    Babaian, RJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) : 1675 - 1680
  • [8] Oncological long-term outcome of whole gland HIFU and open radical prostatectomy: a comparative analysis
    Rosenhammer, Bernd
    Ganzer, Roman
    Zeman, Florian
    Naeger, Theresa
    Fritsche, Hans-Martin
    Blana, Andreas
    Burger, Maximilian
    Bruendl, Johannes
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (10) : 2073 - 2080
  • [9] Indications and long-term results of radical prostatectomy
    Wolff, JM
    PROGRESS IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER, 1997, 5 : 23 - 30
  • [10] Radical prostatectomy - Long-term oncological outcome from a community hospital
    Tol-Fakkar, M
    Hermansson, CG
    Hugosson, J
    Pedersen, K
    Aus, G
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 37 (05): : 376 - 381