Delivery of microbicides to the vagina: difficulties reported with the use of three devices, adherence to use and preferences

被引:33
作者
Hardy, Ellen [1 ]
Hebling, Eliana M.
Sousa, Maria H.
Almeida, Anecy F.
Amaral, Eliana
机构
[1] Ctr Pesquisas & Saude Reprod Campinas, BR-13084971 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, BR-13083970 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] UFMS, Dept Educ, BR-79070900 Mato Grasso Sul, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
microbicides; diaphragm; vaginal ring; applicator; difficulties in use; adherence to use; preferred device;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2007.04.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose: A crossover study was carried out in 405 couples to compare women's difficulties with three different devices that could be used to administer a microbicide and to evaluate adherence to use and preference for any one of the devices. Methods: Couples used a single size diaphragm, a vaginal ring or disposable applicators for 1 month each in a randomly assigned order. Results: Few women reported difficulty using the applicators or the ring; however, almost two-thirds reported difficulty using the diaphragm. Approximately 5%, 10% and 40% of the women and a similar but slightly lower percentage of their partners reported incorrect use of the applicator, vaginal ring and diaphragm, respectively. About half the women preferred the vaginal ring, while around half the men preferred the applicator. Conclusion: The release of microbicides from a vaginal ring is a lead worth pursuing. The diaphragm is the only one of the three devices that also offers mechanical protection, but it requires greater investment in patient education to ensure adherence to use. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 131
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   Who continues using the diaphragm and who doesn't: Implications for the acceptability of female-controlled HIV prevention methods [J].
Harvey, SM ;
Bird, ST ;
Maher, JE ;
Beckman, LJ .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2003, 13 (05) :185-193
[12]  
LAGO TDG, 1995, INT FAMILY PLANNING, V21, P114
[13]   Diaphragms in clinical trials: is clinician fitting necessary? [J].
Mauck, C ;
Lai, JJ ;
Schwartz, J ;
Weiner, DH .
CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 69 (04) :263-266
[14]  
Patton M.Q., 2001, Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.1002/NUR.4770140111
[15]   An acceptability study of female-controlled methods of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda [J].
Pool, R ;
Whitworth, JAG ;
Green, G ;
Mbonye, AK ;
Harrison, S ;
Wilkinson, J ;
Hart, GJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2000, 11 (03) :162-167
[16]   The acceptability of a vaginal microbicide among South African men [J].
Ramjee, G ;
Gouws, E ;
Andrews, A ;
Myer, L ;
Weber, AE .
INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 27 (04) :164-170
[17]  
SALAS VLB, 1990, FEMINILIDADE REVISAO
[18]   EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NON-SPERMICIDAL FIT-FREE DIAPHRAGM [J].
SMITH, C ;
FARR, G ;
FELDBLUM, PJ ;
SPENCE, A .
CONTRACEPTION, 1995, 51 (05) :289-291
[19]  
Woolfson AD, 2000, CRIT REV THER DRUG, V17, P509
[20]  
2003, ALLIANCE MICROB 0725, V4