Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study

被引:5
作者
Oda, Seitaro [1 ]
Awai, Kazuo [1 ]
Funama, Yoshinori [2 ]
Utsunomiya, Daisuke [1 ]
Yanaga, Yumi [1 ]
Kawanaka, Koichi [1 ]
Yamashita, Yasuyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol Sci, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
关键词
Dual-energy subtraction; Flat-panel detector; Chest radiography; ROC analysis; Phantom; FLAT-PANEL DETECTOR; LUNG-CANCER; COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; AMORPHOUS-SILICON; CT; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-009-0411-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules with different X-ray attenuation by flat-panel detector (FPD) chest radiography using a dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction (DES) technique. Using a FPD radiography system, we obtained 108 sets of chest radiographs of a chest phantom. They consisted of 54 sets each of chest radiographs with and without simulated nodules. Each data set contained a standard and a corresponding dualenergy subtracted chest radiograph (DES image). The diameters of the simulated nodules were 8, 10, and 12 mm, respectively; nodules of each size manifested attenuation of -450, -200, and 30 Hounsfield units (HU). We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to compare the observers' performance in detecting nodules. For the -450 HU nodules the mean areas under the ROC curve (AUC) without and with DES images were 0.66 and 0.77, respectively; the difference was significant (paired t-test, P < 0.01). For nodules with -200 and 30 HU, there was no significant difference in the AUC value (0.79 vs. 0.77, P = 0.13; 0.92 vs. 0.94, P = 0.17, respectively). The addition of DES images to standard chest radiographs improved the performance of radiologists charged with detecting simulated nodules with an attenuation of -450 HU.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 219
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, IAEA SAF SER
[2]   Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography [J].
Bacher, K ;
Smeets, P ;
De Hauwere, A ;
Verstraete, K ;
Thierens, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (04) :923-929
[3]   Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography [J].
Floyd, CE ;
Warp, RJ ;
Dobbins, JT ;
Chotas, HG ;
Baydush, AH ;
Vargas-Voracek, R ;
Ravin, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) :683-688
[4]   Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, X-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography:: Contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses [J].
Hamer, OW ;
Völk, M ;
Zorger, N ;
Feuerbach, S ;
Strotzer, M .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (04) :212-220
[5]   Detection of lung cancer using single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography [J].
Ide K. ;
Mogami H. ;
Murakami T. ;
Yasuhara Y. ;
Miyagawa M. ;
Mochizuki T. .
Radiation Medicine, 2007, 25 (5) :195-201
[6]   Peripheral lung cancer: Screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography [J].
Kaneko, M ;
Eguchi, K ;
Ohmatsu, H ;
Kakinuma, R ;
Naruke, T ;
Suemasu, K ;
Moriyama, N .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (03) :798-802
[7]   CONVENTIONAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY VS DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF PULMONARY NODULES [J].
KELCZ, F ;
ZINK, FE ;
PEPPLER, WW ;
KRUGER, DG ;
ERGUN, DL ;
MISTRETTA, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (02) :271-278
[8]  
KIDO S, 1993, INVEST RADIOL, V28, P482
[9]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF PULMONARY NODULES WITH SINGLE-EXPOSURE DUAL-ENERGY SUBTRACTION CHEST RADIOGRAPHY WITH AN ITERATIVE NOISE-REDUCTION ALGORITHM [J].
KIDO, S ;
IKEZOE, J ;
NAITO, H ;
ARISAWA, J ;
TAMURA, S ;
KOZUKA, T ;
ITO, W ;
SHIMURA, K ;
KATO, H .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (02) :407-412
[10]  
Metz CE, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P1033, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980515)17:9<1033::AID-SIM784>3.3.CO