Testing and Validating a Faculty Blended Learning Adoption Model

被引:1
作者
Antwi-Boampong, Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Elect Syst, Ctr Commun Media & Informat Technol, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
blended learning; technology adoption; technology readiness; institutional readiness; motivation; pedagogy; TASK-TECHNOLOGY FIT; READINESS MODEL; EDUCATION; ACCEPTANCE; ONLINE; MOTIVATION; MANAGEMENT; INTENTION; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2022.851921
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Faculty members are crucial to Blended Learning's success in higher education. Despite substantial research into the elements that drive faculty adoption of BL, few have developed a model to explain how these factors combine and influence faculty intentions to teach in this mode. This study used data collected from 207 professors from 18 universities across Africa, the United States, Europe, and the Middle East to test and validate a Faculty Blended Learning Adoption Model which was derived from a Grounded Theory study. Four model constructs (institutional hygiene readiness, student BL disposition, faculty technology ready, and Pedagogy Technology Fit for BL) mediated by motivation were tested to predict faculty Blended Learning adoption using structural equation modeling. The results demonstrated an excellent model fit, with three of the six hypotheses in this study being supported. Faculty desire to utilize BL was found to be influenced by faculty technology readiness and task technology fit for BL, but not by institutional hygiene readiness or student BL disposition. This research presents a useful model for university administrators to use in their BL implementations. A thorough understanding of this model can assist decision-makers in identifying the factors that influence future faculty acceptance or resistance to blended learning, as well as helping them in enhancing acceptance and usage.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   DETERMINANTS OF BLENDED LEARNING ADOPTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION. ADAPTATION OF THE UTAUT MODEL [J].
Martin Garcia, Antonio Victor ;
Garcia del Dujo, Angel ;
Munoz Rodriguez, Jose Manuel .
EDUCACION XX1, 2014, 17 (02) :217-240
[32]   Antecedences of continued blended learning adoption intentions: A framework for acceptance of blended distance learning [J].
Mutawa, A. M. ;
Arami, M. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2022, 10 (2A) :72-81
[33]   BLENDED LEARNING AT HIGHER EDUCATION: CASE STUDY FROM FACULTY OF ECONOMICS [J].
Eger, Ludvik .
NEW TRENDS AND RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN PEDAGOGY AND ANDRAGOGY (NTRCPA18), 2018, :49-62
[34]   Institutional factors for faculty members' implementation of blended learning in higher education [J].
Anthony, Bokolo, Jr. .
EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2021, 63 (05) :701-719
[36]   Precision Teaching and Learning Performance in a Blended Learning Environment [J].
Yin, Bin ;
Yuan, Chih-Hung .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
[37]   The Adoption of Blended Learning among Malaysian Academicians [J].
Haron, Haryani ;
Abbas, Wan Faezah ;
Abd Rahman, Nor Aini .
3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING (ICEL 2011), 2012, 67 :175-181
[38]   Identifying key factors affecting college students' adoption of the e-learning system in mandatory blended learning environments [J].
Zhang, Zhaoli ;
Cao, Taihe ;
Shu, Jiangbo ;
Liu, Hai .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2022, 30 (08) :1388-1401
[40]   Introducing Blended Learning in a Community College: How teachers can be prepared [J].
Bai, Xiaojing ;
Han, Xibin .
2020 NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION THROUGH TECHNOLOGY (EITT 2020), 2020, :64-69