Protein evolution speed depends on its stability and abundance and on chaperone concentrations

被引:48
作者
Agozzino, Luca [1 ,2 ]
Dill, Ken A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Laufer Ctr Phys & Quantitat Biol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Phys & Astron, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Chem, Stony Brook, NY 11790 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
protein evolution; adaptation; substitution rate; HIGHLY EXPRESSED PROTEINS; STATISTICAL PHYSICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; SEQUENCE EVOLUTION; PROTEOMES; EVOLVABILITY; MUTATIONS; CHEMISTRY; BIOLOGY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1810194115
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Proteins evolve at different rates. What drives the speed of protein sequence changes? Two main factors are a protein's folding stability and aggregation propensity. By combining the hydrophobic polar (HP) model with the Zwanzig-Szabo-Bagchi rate theory, we find that: (i) Adaptation is strongly accelerated by selection pressure, explaining the broad variation from days to thousands of years over which organisms adapt to new environments. (ii) The proteins that adapt fastest are those that are not very stably folded, because their fitness landscapes are steepest. And because heating destabilizes folded proteins, we predict that cells should adapt faster when put into warmer rather than cooler environments. (iii) Increasing protein abundance slows down evolution (the substitution rate of the sequence) because a typical protein is not perfectly fit, so increasing its number of copies reduces the cell's fitness. (iv) However, chaperones can mitigate this abundance effect and accelerate evolution (also called evolutionary capacitance) by effectively enhancing protein stability. This model explains key observations about protein evolution rates.
引用
收藏
页码:9092 / 9097
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Aguilar-Rodriguez J, 2016, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V8
[2]   On the application of statistical physics to evolutionary biology [J].
Barton, N. H. ;
Coe, J. B. .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 259 (02) :317-324
[3]   Spatiotemporal microbial evolution on antibiotic landscapes [J].
Baym, Michael ;
Lieberman, Tami D. ;
Kelsic, Eric D. ;
Chait, Remy ;
Gross, Rotem ;
Yelin, Idan ;
Kishony, Roy .
SCIENCE, 2016, 353 (6304) :1147-1151
[4]   Experimental Evolution of a Facultative Thermophile from a Mesophilic Ancestor [J].
Blaby, Ian K. ;
Lyons, Benjamin J. ;
Wroclawska-Hughes, Ewa ;
Phillips, Grier C. F. ;
Pyle, Tyler P. ;
Chamberlin, Stephen G. ;
Benner, Steven A. ;
Lyons, Thomas J. ;
de Crecy-Lagard, Valerie ;
de Crecy, Eudes .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 78 (01) :144-155
[5]   Chaperones Divide Yeast Proteins into Classes of Expression Level and Evolutionary Rate [J].
Bogumil, David ;
Landan, Giddy ;
Ilhan, Judith ;
Dagan, Tal .
GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 4 (05) :618-625
[6]   The contribution of statistical physics to evolutionary biology [J].
de Vladar, Harold P. ;
Barton, Nicholas H. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2011, 26 (08) :424-432
[7]   Physical limits of cells and proteomes [J].
Dill, Ken A. ;
Ghosh, Kingshuk ;
Schmit, Jeremy D. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (44) :17876-17882
[8]   Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution [J].
Drummond, D. Allan ;
Wilke, Claus O. .
CELL, 2008, 134 (02) :341-352
[9]   Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly [J].
Drummond, DA ;
Bloom, JD ;
Adami, C ;
Wilke, CO ;
Arnold, FH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (40) :14338-14343
[10]   Biophysical Models of Protein Evolution: Understanding the Patterns of Evolutionary Sequence Divergence [J].
Echave, Julian ;
Wilke, Claus O. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS, VOL 46, 2017, 46 :85-103