Green supplier selection and evaluation using DEA-type composite indicators

被引:110
作者
Dobos, Imre [1 ]
Vorosmarty, Gyongyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Fovam Ter 8, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Green supplier assessment; DEA; Common weights analysis; Composite indicators; Multicriteria decision making; CHAIN MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; CRITERIA; RANKING; WEIGHTS; UNITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.026
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Supplier assessment is widely studied in the literature as it is an important means of managing supplier relationships. Although some evaluation methods have been proposed in the literature to measure suppliers' green performance, they are not developed specifically to help other than strategic purchasing situation. Based on literature results our paper examines the extension of the vendor evaluation methods with environmental, green issues. This generalization means an extension of the traditional criteria and weight system of the supplier evaluation methods. In our paper the method composite indicators (CI) is used to study the extension of traditional supplier selection methods with environmental factors. The selection of the weight system can control the result of the selection process. Our goal is to choose such weights which affect the results of the selection process. In this method we divide the criteria in two manners: the traditional (managerial) and environmental (green) factors. Then with the help of CI we are searching a weight system with which the environmental criteria can influence the decision with a representation of the green factors. In our study we look for a weight system to determine the environmental factors, as an important decision factors. To choose the mentioned weight system, we apply data envelopment analysis (DEA) with the common weights analysis (CWA) method. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 278
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SUST REP GUID G3 1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GREENING SUPPLY CHAI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, INT J PURCH MATER MA, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-493X.1997.TB00026.X
[4]   A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. ;
Goyal, S. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 126 (02) :370-378
[5]   Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (12) :1200-1210
[6]   Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 124 (01) :252-264
[7]   Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation [J].
Carter, CR ;
Kale, R ;
Grimm, CM .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2000, 36 (03) :219-228
[8]   Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index [J].
Cherchye, L. ;
Moesen, W. ;
Rogge, N. ;
Van Puyenbroeck, T. ;
Saisana, M. ;
Saltelli, A. ;
Liska, R. ;
Tarantola, S. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2008, 59 (02) :239-251
[9]  
De Boer L., 2003, J PURCHASING SUPPLY, V9, P109
[10]  
De Boer L., 2001, EUROPEAN J PURCHASIN, V7, P75, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9, 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9]