Recent Advances in Computational Models for the Study of Protein-Peptide Interactions

被引:17
|
作者
Kilburg, D. [1 ,2 ]
Gallicchio, E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brooklyn Coll, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BINDING FREE-ENERGY; FRAGILE-X-SYNDROME; LIGAND-BINDING; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; FLEXIBLE DOCKING; INHIBITORS; PREDICTION; TRANSLATION; AFFINITIES; DATABASE;
D O I
10.1016/bs.apcsb.2016.06.002
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We review computational models and software tools in current use for the study of protein-peptide interactions. Peptides and peptide derivatives are growing in interest as therapeutic agents to target protein-protein interactions. Protein-protein interactions are pervasive in biological systems and are responsible for the regulation of critical functions within the cell. Mutations or dysregulation of expression can alter the network of interactions among proteins and cause diseases such as cancer. Protein-protein binding interfaces, which are often large, shallow, and relatively feature-less, are difficult to target with small-molecule inhibitors. Peptide derivatives based on the binding motifs present in the target protein complex are increasingly drawing interest as superior alternatives to conventional small-molecule inhibitors. However, the design of peptide-based inhibitors also presents novel challenges. Peptides are more complex and more flexible than standard medicinal compounds. They also tend to form more extended and more complex interactions with their protein targets. Computational modeling is increasingly being employed to supplement synthetic and biochemical work to offer guidance and energetic and structural insights. In this review, we discuss recent in silico structure-based and physics-based approaches currently employed to model protein-peptide interactions with a few examples of their applications.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 57
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combining Design and Selection to Create Novel Protein-Peptide Interactions
    Speltz, E. B.
    Sawyer, N.
    Regan, L.
    PEPTIDE, PROTEIN AND ENZYME DESIGN, 2016, 580 : 203 - 222
  • [22] Protein-peptide interactions in mixtures of whey peptides and whey proteins
    Creusot, Nathalie
    Gruppen, Harry
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2007, 55 (06) : 2474 - 2481
  • [23] Protein-peptide interactions using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
    del Toro, J
    Pastrana, B
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2001, 12 : 27A - 27A
  • [24] Development of a structural database and docking benchmark for protein-peptide interactions
    Acahrya, Chayan
    Kufareva, Irina
    Ilatovskiy, Andrey
    Abagyan, Ruben
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 243
  • [25] Computational Site Saturation Mutagenesis of Canonical and Non-Canonical Amino Acids to Probe Protein-Peptide Interactions
    Holden, Jeffrey K.
    Pavlovicz, Ryan
    Gobbi, Alberto
    Song, Yifan
    Cunningham, Christian N.
    FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES, 2022, 9
  • [26] Protein-Peptide Interactions Adopt the Same Structural Motifs as Monomeric Protein Folds
    Vanhee, Peter
    Stricher, Francois
    Baeten, Lies
    Verschueren, Erik
    Lenaerts, Tom
    Serrano, Luis
    Rousseau, Frederic
    Schymkowitz, Joost
    STRUCTURE, 2009, 17 (08) : 1128 - 1136
  • [27] Recent advances in computational protein design
    Pantazes, Robert J.
    Grisewood, Matthew J.
    Maranas, Costas D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (04) : 467 - 472
  • [28] A FAST AND ACCURATE EMPIRICAL EXPRESSION FOR PREDICTING PROTEIN-PROTEIN AND PROTEIN-PEPTIDE INTERACTIONS
    Audie, J.
    Audie, D.
    Boyd, C.
    BIOPOLYMERS, 2009, 92 (04) : 358 - 358
  • [29] SELDI-TOF-MS as a rapid tool to study food related protein-peptide interactions
    Kosters, H. A.
    Wierenga, P. A.
    Gruppen, H.
    FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS, 2010, 24 (6-7) : 667 - 673
  • [30] Dye-pair reporter systems for protein-peptide molecular interactions
    Geoghegan, KF
    Rosner, PJ
    Hoth, LR
    BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY, 2000, 11 (01) : 71 - 77