Kinematic differences between uphill roller skiing and on-snow skiing using the V2 skating technique

被引:7
|
作者
Myklebust, Havard [1 ]
Losnegard, Thomas [2 ]
Hallen, Jostein [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Fac Arts & Educ, Dept Educ & Sports Sci, POB 8600, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
[2] Norwegian Sch Sport Sci, Dept Phys Performance, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Accelerometer; Gear; 3; Gyroscope; Inertial sensors; Training specificity; Validity; POLE LENGTHS; COUNTRY; PERFORMANCE; O-2-COST; SPEED; COST; MASS; SKIS; V1;
D O I
10.1007/s00421-022-05007-0
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Purpose Roller skiing is the primary sport-specific training and testing mode during pre-competition periods for cross-country skiers, biathletes, and Nordic combined athletes. The present study aimed to compare the kinematics between uphill roller skiing and on-snow skiing using the V2 sub-technique. Methods In a cross-over design, nine well-trained male skiers performed short trials (< 40 s) at constant inclination (8.0 degrees), speed (3.0 m.s(-1)), and controlled rolling/gliding friction on asphalt (in the fall), on the treadmill (in the fall and winter), and during on-snow skiing (in the winter). Kinematic data were collected using a validated inertial measurement unit system. Results Repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed no differences between treadmill and asphalt roller skiing. Further, including on-snow skiing showed moderate to good reliability (ICC >= 0.63, p <= 0.001) for ground-contact temporal variables. However, on-snow skiing moderately increased hip range of motion around the longitudinal axis (22.2 +/- 7.7 degrees vs. 14.1 +/- 4.7 degrees), lateral hip displacement (44.1 +/- 7.1 cm vs. 37.2 +/- 6.6 cm) and pole push times (422 +/- 41 ms vs. 386 +/- 31 ms), and on-snow skiing was characterized by altered hip rotational patterns compared to roller skiing. Conclusion V2 roller ski skating simulates on-snow ski skating to a large extent, but the mechanical properties of the skis and/or surface hardness systematically alter skiers' hip movements and pole push times. This implies a potential for equipment optimization to increase training specificity during pre-competition periods and highlights a need for future studies to examine the kinematic effects of snow hardness on all sub-techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:2355 / 2365
页数:11
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Kinematic differences between uphill roller skiing and on-snow skiing using the V2 skating technique
    Håvard Myklebust
    Thomas Losnegard
    Jostein Hallén
    European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2022, 122 : 2355 - 2365
  • [2] Comparative Analysis of the Diagonal Stride Technique during Roller Skiing and On-Snow Skiing in Youth Cross-Country Skiers
    Ma, Mujia
    Zhao, Shuang
    Long, Ting
    Song, Qingquan
    Holmberg, Hans-Christer
    Liu, Hui
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (05)
  • [3] NO DIFFERENCES IN O2-COST BETWEEN V1 AND V2 SKATING TECHNIQUES DURING TREADMILL ROLLER SKIING AT MODERATE TO STEEP INCLINES
    Losnegard, Thomas
    Myklebust, Havard
    Hallen, Jostein
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2012, 26 (05) : 1340 - 1347
  • [4] Changes in biomechanics of skiing at maximal velocity caused by simulated 20-km skiing race using V2 skating technique
    Ohtonen, O.
    Lindinger, S. J.
    Goepfert, C.
    Rapp, W.
    Linnamo, V.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2018, 28 (02) : 479 - 486
  • [5] Double-Push Skating versus V2 and V1 Skating on Uphill Terrain in Cross-Country Skiing
    Stoeggl, Thomas
    Kampel, Wolfgang
    Mueller, Erich
    Lindinger, Stefan
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2010, 42 (01) : 187 - 196
  • [6] Macro-Kinematic Differences Between Sprint and Distance Cross-Country Skiing Competitions Using the Classical Technique
    Marsland, Finn
    Anson, Judith
    Waddington, Gordon
    Holmberg, Hans-Christer
    Chapman, Dale W.
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 9