Evaluation of the effects of strain-specific antigen variation on the accuracy of serologic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

It has been suggested that enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits validated in one region may yield variable diagnostic performance results in different regions, possibly due to strain-specific differences in antibody responses in different populations. We tested C-13-urea breath test-characterized serum samples from 109 U.S. patients and 288 Japanese patients using enzyme immunoassay with different preparations of high-molecular-weight cell-associated (HM-CAP) antigens that are conserved across Helicobacter pylori strains. Replicate antigens were prepared from five H. pylori clinical isolates. Eight antigen preparations were evaluated: two of U.S. origin and six of Japanese origin. The accuracies achieved with the eight antigen preparations ranged from 94.4 to 96.3% with the U.S. samples. With the Japanese samples the accuracies achieved ranged from 92.3 to 97.2%. Use of a pool of HM-CAP antigens prepared from isolates from Japan resulted in a higher median enzyme immunoassay value and slightly fewer samples with indeterminate results compared to the results obtained by use of the U.S. standard HM-CAP antigen for H. pylori-positive patients (accuracies, 97.2 and 92.3%, respectively), suggesting that variations in performance between both antigen source and patient population might be reduced by using antigens pooled from several strains.