Sensory and chemical characteristics of Canadian ice wines

被引:110
作者
Nurgel, C
Pickering, GJ
Inglis, DL
机构
[1] Brock Univ, Cool Climate Oenol & Viticulture Inst, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[2] Brock Univ, Dept Biol Sci, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[3] Brock Univ, Dept Psychol, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
关键词
Canadian ice wine; chemical and sensory analysis; vidal; riesling; Ontario; British Columbia;
D O I
10.1002/jsfa.1860
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Fifty-one Canadian ice wines, representative of a range of varieties and vintages, were evaluated chemically and 20 wines further evaluated sensorally. Ice wines from British Columbia and Ontario were significantly different for a range of chemical and sensory attributes. British Columbia ice wines had higher titratable acidity, acetic acid and glucose, and lower colour and ethyl acetate content compared with those from Ontario. Apricot, raisin, honey and oak aromas were more pronounced in Ontario ice wines, while British Columbia ice wines had higher intensities of pineapple and oxidized aromas. Riesling ice wines had higher titratable acidity and glucose and lower pH and A(420) values compared with Vidal. Vintage effects were also found for pH, A(420), glucose, fructose, ethanol and ethyl acetate. (C) 2004 Society of Chemical Industry.
引用
收藏
页码:1675 / 1684
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Amerine M. A, 1974, WINE MUST ANALYSIS, P121
  • [2] AMERINE MA, 1983, WINES THEIR SENSORY, P374
  • [3] BAYINDIRLI L, 1993, J FOOD P PRESERV, V17, P47
  • [4] Bisson LF, 1999, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V50, P107
  • [5] CHISHOLM MG, 1995, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V46, P56
  • [6] CHISHOLM MG, 1994, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V45, P201
  • [7] Cliff M, 2002, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V53, P46
  • [8] DAUDT CE, 1973, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V24, P3
  • [9] Etievant P., 1991, VOLATILE COMPOUNDS F, P145
  • [10] The impact of geographic origin, vintage and wine estate on sensory properties of Vitis vinifera cv. Riesling wines
    Fischer, U
    Roth, D
    Christmann, M
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 1999, 10 (4-5) : 281 - 288