Prioritizing Energy Blockchain Use Cases Using Type-2 Neutrosophic Number-Based EDAS

被引:29
作者
Cali, Umit [1 ]
Deveci, Muhammet [2 ,3 ]
Saha, Shammya Shananda [4 ]
Halden, Ugur [1 ]
Smarandache, Florentin [5 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Imperial Coll London, Royal Sch Mines, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Naval Acad, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34940 Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Elect Power Res Inst, Knoxville, TN 37932 USA
[5] Univ New Mexico, Dept Math, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Blockchains; Distributed ledger; Decision making; Power systems; Analytical models; Renewable energy sources; Industries; Blockchain; distributed ledger technology; energy use case; fuzzy sets; multi-criteria decision making; neutrosophic numbers; PEER-TO-PEER; DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TECHNOLOGY; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; FUZZY; DISTANCE; MARKETS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3162190
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The modern power systems are evolving in parallel to the development of other technological trends such as decarbonization and digitalization. While the penetration of renewable energy resources is increasing within the national and regional energy mix, emerging digitalization technologies, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain technology are shaping modern power systems. Especially blockchain technology has a very high potential to disrupt the current and future energy sector landscape by enabling various use cases in this domain. This paper aims to prioritize different energy use cases where blockchain technology can actively be utilized to create additional value. This study proposes a Type-2 Neutrosophic Number (T2NN) based Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) to evaluate and rank a set of existing use cases of an energy blockchain system. Testing and validation of the model is done through a comparison against one alternative T2NN based Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model and an existing approach from literature. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is performed, revealing that changing criteria weightings do not affect the ranking order of the use cases of the energy blockchain system. Prioritizing the use cases can assist the companies, standardization bodies, and related government authorities to make better decisions for their operations, such as ranking the investment decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:34260 / 34276
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] An approach of TOPSIS technique for developing supplier selection with group decision making under type-2 neutrosophic number
    Abdel-Basset, Mohamed
    Saleh, M.
    Gamal, Abduallah
    Smarandache, Florentin
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 77 : 438 - 452
  • [2] Lelantos: A Blockchain-based Anonymous Physical Delivery System
    AlTawy, Riham
    ElSheikh, Muhammad
    Youssef, Amr M.
    Gong, Guang
    [J]. 2017 15TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON PRIVACY, SECURITY AND TRUST (PST), 2017, : 15 - 24
  • [3] Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities
    Andoni, Merlinda
    Robu, Valentin
    Flynn, David
    Abram, Simone
    Geach, Dale
    Jenkins, David
    McCallum, Peter
    Peacock, Andrew
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 100 : 143 - 174
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, CONN CAMP TEST TRANS
  • [5] INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS
    ATANASSOV, KT
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) : 87 - 96
  • [6] Bellavitis C., 2021, Journal of Business Venturing Insights, V15, pe00213, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JBVI.2020.E00213
  • [7] Biswas P., 2016, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, V12, P20
  • [8] Cali U., 2020, Cases on Green Energy and Sustainable Development, P438, DOI DOI 10.4018/978-1-5225-8559-6.CH016
  • [9] Cali U., 2019, PROC IEEE PES TRANSA, P1
  • [10] Energy Policy Instruments for Distributed Ledger Technology Empowered Peer-to-Peer Local Energy Markets
    Cali, Umit
    Cakir, Ozan
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 82888 - 82900