Stated preference methods and landscape ecology indicators: An example of transdisciplinarity in landscape economic valuation

被引:25
作者
Tagliafierro, C. [1 ]
Boeri, M. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Longo, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hutchinson, W. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Gibson Inst, Inst Global Food Secur, Sch Biol Sci, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, UKCRC Ctr Excellence Publ Hlth NI, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Excellence Publ Hlth, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] BC3, Bilbao 48008, Spain
[5] RTI Hlth Solut, Hlth Preference Assessment, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
关键词
MIXED LOGIT MODEL; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; CONTINGENT VALUATION; PUBLIC-GOODS; HETEROGENEOUS PREFERENCES; NONMARKET VALUATION; INFORMATION; WILLINGNESS; FRAMEWORK; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.022
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the representation of landscape complexity in stated preferences research. It integrates landscape ecology and landscape economics and conducts the landscape analysis in a three-dimensional space to provide ecologically meaningful quantitative landscape indicators that are used as variables for the monetary valuation of landscape in a stated preferences study. Expected heterogeneity in taste intensity across respondents is addressed with a mixed logit model in willingness to pay space. Our methodology is applied to value, in monetary terms, the landscape of the Sorrento Peninsula in Italy, an area that has faced increasing pressure from urbanisation affecting its traditional horticultural, herbaceous, and arboreal structure, with loss of biodiversity, and an increasing risk of landslides. We find that residents of the Sorrento Peninsula would prefer landscapes characterised by large open views and natural features. Residents also appear to dislike increasing level of landscape heterogeneity and the presence of lemon orchards and farmers' stewardship, which are associated with the current failure of protecting the traditional landscape. The outcomes suggest that the use of landscape ecology metrics in a stated preferences model maybe an effective way to move forward integrated methodologies to better understand and represent landscape and its complexity. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 22
页数:12
相关论文
共 99 条
[21]   Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution [J].
Broch, Stine Wamberg ;
Strange, Niels ;
Jacobsen, Jette B. ;
Wilson, Kerrie A. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 92 :78-86
[22]   Spatial Preference Heterogeneity: A Choice Experiment [J].
Brouwer, Roy ;
Martin-Ortega, Julia ;
Berbel, Julio .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2010, 86 (03) :552-568
[23]  
Burgess D., 2009, P EUR CONS LANDSC EC
[24]   Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: Combining mixed logit and random-effects models [J].
Campbell, Danny .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 58 (03) :467-483
[25]   Learning, fatigue and preference formation in discrete choice experiments [J].
Campbell, Danny ;
Boeri, Marco ;
Doherty, Edel ;
Hutchinson, W. George .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2015, 119 :345-363
[26]   GIS-Based Hedonic Pricing of Landscape [J].
Cavailhes, Jean ;
Brossard, Thierry ;
Foltete, Jean-Christophe ;
Hilal, Mohamed ;
Joly, Daniel ;
Tourneux, Francois-Pierre ;
Tritz, Celine ;
Wavresky, Pierre .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 44 (04) :571-590
[27]   Analysis of choice inconsistencies in on-line choice experiments: impact on welfare measures [J].
Colombo, Sergio ;
Glenk, Klaus ;
Rocamora-Montiel, Beatriz .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 43 (02) :271-302
[28]   Modeling preference heterogeneity in stated choice data: an analysis for public goods generated by agriculture [J].
Colombo, Sergio ;
Hanley, Nick ;
Louviere, Jordan .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 40 (03) :307-322
[29]  
Comune di Sorrento, 2011, PORT I COM SORR
[30]   Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century [J].
Daniel, TC .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2001, 54 (1-4) :267-281