A simple method for the comparison of bioclimatic design strategies based on dynamic indoor thermal comfort assessment for school buildings

被引:7
作者
De Angelis, Enrico [1 ]
Tagliabue, Lavinia C. [2 ]
Cecconi, Fulvio Re [1 ]
Mainini, Andrea G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture Built Environm & Construct Engn, Via G Ponzio 31, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Brescia, Dept Civil Environm Architectural Engn & Math, Via Branze 42, I-25123 Brescia, Italy
来源
INTERNATIONAL HIGH-PERFORMANCE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE - A SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE 2016 SERIES (SBE16), IHBE 2016 | 2017年 / 180卷
关键词
Thermal comfort; thermal inertia; school building; bioclimatic architecture; energy performance and data analysis; INERTIA; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.248
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Bioclimatic design strategies have been proposed for decades, on a qualitative basis, because a quantitative approach, ineludibly based on dynamic measurements or simulations, was too expansive and complex. If simulation considerably evolved, in the last years, in terms of speed, cost and diffusion of available tools, their utilization is still complicated by the managing a huge amount of hourly data. The passive behavior of a building, moreover, is not effortlessly synthetized: conditioned buildings may be easily compared just summing the hourly consumption of primary energy, while buildings with no thermal plant need more sophisticated statistical analyses because in these kind of buildings, it is particularly difficult to assess the effect thermal inertia. The existing school buildings stock has a strong need of energy renovation in accordance with Government vision of a community 24 hours a day use and consequently increasing the requirement of comfort conditions and energy consumption. Hence, a current school building heated and not cooled is considered as application field of the novel methodology and a classroom is used to test different energy retrofit solutions compared against a base- line, in terms of capacity to decrease the indoor air temperature variation. The analyzed simulations have been thus compared with ideal comfort conditions by an original analysis approach based on a visual tool as a support for designers in choices comparison to simply assess and visualize the performance of building technologies. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 880
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, BUILD B ED FOUND AG, VBB93
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, BUILD B ED FOUND AG, V90
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, TM572015 CIBSE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, MODEL BEHAV SPRINGE
[5]   The influence of the external walls thermal inertia on the energy performance of well insulated buildings [J].
Aste, Niccolo ;
Angelotti, Adriana ;
Buzzetti, Michela .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 41 (11) :1181-1187
[6]  
Barrett P., 2015, CLEVER CLASSROOM SUM
[7]   The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis [J].
Barrett, Peter ;
Davies, Fay ;
Zhang, Yufan ;
Barrett, Lucinda .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 89 :118-133
[8]  
Basarir B., 2012, Energy efficient retrofit methods at thebuilding envelopes of the school buildings
[9]  
Chatzidiakou L., 2014, The Effects of Thermal Conditions and Indoor Air Quality on Health, Comfort and Cognitive Performance of Students
[10]  
Citterio M., RSE2009165 ENEA