Conceptualizing power to study social-ecological interactions

被引:101
|
作者
Boonstra, Wiebren J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2016年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
fire domestication; power; resilience; social responsibility; social-ecological interactions; sociology; RESILIENCE THINKING; FIRE USE; FISHERIES; SYSTEMS; ADAPTABILITY; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.5751/ES-07966-210121
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
My aim is to conceptualize power using social science theory and to demonstrate why and how the concept of power can complement resilience studies and other analyses of social-ecological interaction. Social power as a scientific concept refers to the ability to influence both conduct and context. These two dimensions of power (conduct and context) can be observed by differentiating between various sources of power, including, for example, technology or mental power. The relevance of the conceptualization of power presented here is illustrated with the example of fire as a source of social-ecological power. I conclude by discussing how attention to power can help to address issues of social justice and responsibility in social-ecological interactions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social-ecological systems
    Barnes, Michele L.
    Bodin, Orjan
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    McAllister, Ryan R. J.
    Alexander, Steven M.
    Robins, Garry
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 22 (04):
  • [42] Demystifying governance and its role for transitions in urban social-ecological systems
    Munoz-Erickson, Tischa A.
    Campbell, Lindsay K.
    Childers, Daniel L.
    Grove, J. Morgan
    Iwaniec, David M.
    Pickett, Steward T. A.
    Romolini, Michele
    Svendsen, Erika S.
    ECOSPHERE, 2016, 7 (11):
  • [43] Frontiers in Social-Ecological Urbanism
    Colding, Johan
    Samuelsson, Karl
    Marcus, Lars
    Gren, Asa
    Legeby, Ann
    Pont, Meta Berghauser
    Barthel, Stephan
    LAND, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [44] Expanding the contribution of the social sciences to social-ecological resilience research
    Stone-Jovicich, Samantha
    Goldstein, Bruce E.
    Brown, Katrina
    Plummer, Ryan
    Olsson, Per
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (01):
  • [45] Assessing countries' social-ecological resilience to shifting marine commercial species
    Ojea, Elena
    Fontan, Elena
    Fuentes-Santos, Isabel
    Bueno-Pardo, Juan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [46] Stasis and change: social psychological insights into social-ecological resilience
    Hobman, Elizabeth V.
    Walker, Iain
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [47] Access as the Means for Understanding Social-Ecological Resilience: Bridging Analytical Frameworks
    Calderon-Contreras, Rafael
    White, Carole Sandrine
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 33 (02) : 205 - 223
  • [48] Social-ecological status index: A preliminary study of its structural composition and application
    Estoque, Ronald C.
    Murayama, Yuji
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 43 : 183 - 194
  • [49] Promoting agency for social-ecological transformation: a transformation-lab in the Xochimilco social-ecological system
    Charli-Joseph, Lakshmi
    Mario Siqueiros-Garcia, J.
    Eakin, Hallie
    Manuel-Navarrete, David
    Shelton, Rebecca
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (02):
  • [50] Applying a social-ecological well-being approach to enhance opportunities for marine protected area governance
    Brueckner-Irwin, Irene
    Armitage, Derek
    Courtenay, Simon
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 24 (03):