State of the field: Data and metrics for geographic analyses of entrepreneurial ecosystems

被引:32
作者
Credit, Kevin [1 ]
Mack, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Mayer, Heike [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Ctr Spatial Data Sci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Geog Environm & Spatial Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Univ Bern, Ctr Reg Econ Dev, Inst Geog, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
PRE-ENTRY EXPERIENCE; UNIVERSITY SPIN-OFFS; REGIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; PERIPHERAL REGIONS; NATIONAL CULTURE; FIRM SURVIVAL; PERFORMANCE; GROWTH; EVOLUTION; URBAN;
D O I
10.1111/gec3.12380
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Despite burgeoning interest in entrepreneurial ecosystems, there is little information on metrics for studying the actors and interconnections within these systems. The increasing availability of data and metrics for characterizing entrepreneurial activity in recent years provide opportunities for analyzing EE in more holistic ways. A critical first step in advancing work on this topic, however, is to critically review the use and limitations of currently available data with a focus on the very recent ecosystems literature, as well as constituent topics such as entrepreneurial heritage and spinoffs, entrepreneurial culture, and studies of emerging ecosystems in peripheral regions. In this review, the problems and prospects of available data are discussed, particularly the spatial scales (national or subnational) at which they are available. The paper closes with a critical discussion of the data needed to move the field forward in the four ecosystem-related topical areas and answer important questions related to the nuanced geographies of EE at the subnational level. This discussion suggests present gaps may be related to a poverty of data-sharing efforts rather than a poverty of available data.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Stam, Erik ;
Audretsch, David B. ;
O'Connor, Allan .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (01) :1-10
[2]   A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda [J].
Alvedalen, Janna ;
Boschma, Ron .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2017, 25 (06) :887-903
[3]   Characteristics and performance of new firms and spinoffs in Sweden [J].
Andersson, Martin ;
Klepper, Steven .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2013, 22 (01) :245-280
[4]  
Andresson S., 2000, INT STUDIES MANAGEME, V30, P63, DOI [10.1080/00208825.2000.11656783, DOI 10.1080/00208825.2000.11656783]
[5]  
[Anonymous], IPUMS NATL HIST GEOG, DOI 10.18128/D050.V12.0
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, DOI DOI 10.1177/2F104225879001400303
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1994, REGIONAL ADVANTAGE C, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Industrial Networks and Proximity
[9]  
Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB), 2018, US REL CENS 2010
[10]  
Audretsch DB, 2016, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V41, P1, DOI [10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8, 10.1007/s10961-014-9381-8]