Supply Considerations for Scaling Up Clean Cooking Fuels for Household Energy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

被引:95
作者
Puzzolo, E. [1 ,2 ]
Zerriffi, H. [3 ]
Carter, E. [4 ]
Clemens, H. [5 ]
Stokes, H. [6 ]
Jagger, P. [7 ]
Rosenthal, J. [8 ]
Petach, H. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Publ Hlth & Policy, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Global LPG Partnership, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Forest Resources Management, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Colorado State Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[5] Hivos, The Hague, Netherlands
[6] Project Gaia Inc, Gettysburg, PA USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[8] NIH, Fogarty Int Ctr, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[9] US Agcy Int Dev, Washington, DC 20523 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
clean cooking; fuel supply; household air pollution; clean energy; clean fuels; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; AIR-POLLUTION; COOKSTOVE INTERVENTION; BIOGAS PROGRAM; SOLID FUELS; IMPACT; ADOPTION; HEALTH; INDIA; LPG;
D O I
10.1029/2019GH000208
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Promoting access to clean household cooking energy is an important subject for policy making in low- and middle-income countries, in light of urgent and global efforts to achieve universal energy access by 2030 (Sustainable Development Goal 7). In 2014, the World Health Organization issued "Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Household Fuel Combustion", which recommended a shift to cleaner fuels rather than promotion of technologies that more efficiently combust solid fuels. This study fills an important gap in the literature on transitions to household use of clean cooking energy by reviewing supply chain considerations for clean fuel options in low- and middle-income countries. For the purpose of this study, we consider electricity, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), alcohol fuels, biogas, and compressed biomass pellets burned in high performing gasifier stoves to be clean fuel options. Each of the clean fuels reviewed in this study, as well as the supply of electricity, presents both constraints and opportunities for enhanced production, supply, delivery, and long-term sustainability and scalability in resource-poor settings. These options are reviewed and discussed together with policy and regulatory considerations to help in making these fuel and energy choices available and affordable. Our hope is that researchers, government officials and policy makers, and development agencies and investors will be aided by our comparative analysis of these clean household energy choices.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 390
页数:21
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Alleyne M. T. S. C., 2013, ENERGY SUBSIDY REFOR
[2]  
Amigun B., 2012, ANAEROBIC BIOGAS GEN, DOI [10.5772/, DOI 10.5772/32630, 10.5772/32630]
[3]   Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis [J].
Angelsen, Arild ;
Jagger, Pamela ;
Babigumira, Ronnie ;
Belcher, Brian ;
Hogarth, Nicholas J. ;
Bauch, Simone ;
Boerner, Jan ;
Smith-Hall, Carsten ;
Wunder, Sven .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 64 :S12-S28
[4]  
[Anonymous], WORLDS LARG CO2 METH
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Renewables 2018 Global Status Report
[6]  
[Anonymous], HAS INDIAS UJJWALA P
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Biogas for domestic cooking: Technology brief
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Formative evaluation toolkit: A step-by-step guide and resources for evaluating program implementation and early outcomes
[9]  
ASTM International, 2016, STAND SPEC DEN ETH U
[10]  
Ateba BB, 2018, J ENERGY SOUTH AFR, V29, P51