Research on Development Strategy of China's Technology Transfer Based on SWOT-QSPM Model

被引:0
作者
Yu, Liu [1 ,2 ]
Shu, Fang [1 ,2 ]
Wenjuan, Xu [1 ]
Ying, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Zhiping, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Huanhuan, Hou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Chengdu Lib & Informat Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Dept Lib Informat & Arch Management, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
来源
QUALITATIVE & QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN LIBRARIES | 2019年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
technology transfer; SWOT; QSPM; development strategy; alternative option; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
[Purpose/significance] This paper used SWOT-QSPM model to explore the most suitable development strategy for China's technology transfer. Then, it studied the priorities of the various implementation options in this strategy, and proposed countermeasures. It provided theoretical models for the future research development of China's technology transfer. [Method/process] This paper comprehensively investigated the four influencing factors of advantages, disadvantages, opportunities and threats of China's technology transfer development status. Furthermore, it used the SWOT model to deeply analyze the development environment, relationship and trend of China's technology transfer, and thus obtained the most suitable development strategy. Then QSPM matrix was used to determine the priority of the four alternative options for this strategy, and finally it formulated countermeasures for implementation. [Result/conclusion] The most suitable competitive strategy for China's technology transfer was in a good development situation in which advantages and opportunities occupied a dominant position. And the most suitable strategy for future development was the SO aggressive strategy. What's more, the four options were in order of priority, followed by policy guidance, demand orientation, integrate development and service escort.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 259
页数:23
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Agarwal Ravi, 2012, Journal of Business Strategy, V33, P12, DOI 10.1108/02756661211206708
[2]   A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RELATIONSHIPS [J].
BONACCORSI, A ;
PICCALUGA, A .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 1994, 24 (03) :229-247
[3]  
Bush V, 1945, Science: The endless frontier, DOI DOI 10.2307/3625196
[4]  
Chen J. D., 2017, SCI TECHNOLOGY MANAG, V23, P166
[5]  
DAVID FR, 1985, J SYST MANAGE, V36, P24
[6]  
Fuentes D.D., 1999, International Review of Applied Economics, V13, P111
[7]  
Hu Z. Y., 2012, SEEKER, P173
[8]  
Huang XJ, 2015, CHINESE U SCI TECHNO, P95
[9]  
Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change Working Grp III, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P1
[10]  
Kundu N., 2015, South Asian Journal of Management, V22, P69