Remote sensing, hydrological modeling and in situ observations in snow cover research: A review

被引:138
作者
Dong, Chunyu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Geog, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Remote sensing; Hydrological model; Field measurement; Snow cover; Geotagged photo; LAND-SURFACE MODEL; WATER EQUIVALENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GRAIN-SIZE; PART II; OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; DATA ASSIMILATION; LIDAR MEASUREMENT; COLD REGIONS; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Snow is an important component of the hydrological cycle. As a major part of the cryosphere, snow cover also represents a valuable terrestrial water resource. In the context of climate change, the dynamics of snow cover play a crucial role in rebalancing the global energy and water budgets. Remote sensing, hydrological modeling and in situ observations are three techniques frequently utilized for snow cover investigations. However, the uncertainties caused by systematic errors, scale gaps, and complicated snow physics, among other factors, limit the usability of these three approaches in snow studies. In this paper, an overview of the advantages, limitations and recent progress of the three methods is presented, and more effective ways to estimate snow cover properties are evaluated. The possibility of improving remotely sensed snow information using ground-based observations is discussed. As a rapidly growing source of volunteered geographic information (VGI), web-based geotagged photos have great potential to provide ground truth data for remotely sensed products and hydrological models and thus contribute to procedures for cloud removal, correction, validation, forcing and assimilation. Finally, this review proposes a synergistic framework for the future of snow cover research. This framework highlights the cross-scale integration of in situ and remotely sensed snow measurements and the assimilation of improved remote sensing data into hydrological models.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 583
页数:11
相关论文
共 166 条
[1]   Application of snowmelt runoff model (SRM) in mountainous watersheds: A review [J].
Abudu, Shalamu ;
Cui, Chun-Liang ;
Saydi, Muattar ;
King, James Phillip .
WATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 5 (02) :123-136
[2]   Global Distribution of Snow Precipitation Features and Their Properties from 3 Years of GPM Observations [J].
Adhikari, Abishek ;
Liu, Chuntao ;
Kulie, Mark S. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (10) :3731-3754
[3]   Hydrologic Calibration and Validation of SWAT in a Snow-Dominated Rocky Mountain Watershed, Montana, USA [J].
Ahl, Robert S. ;
Woods, Scott W. ;
Zuuring, Hans R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2008, 44 (06) :1411-1430
[4]  
Anderson E. A., 1973, NWSHYDRO17 NOAA US D
[5]  
Anderson E.A, 1976, 19 NOAA US DEP COMM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SNOW DAT ASS SYST SN
[7]  
[Anonymous], SMHI REP MET
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, HYDROL RES LETT, DOI [DOI 10.3178/HRL.2.65, 10.3178/hrl.2.65]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CONTRIBUTION WORKING, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324
[10]  
Armstrong R., 2001, Historical Soviet Daily Snow Depth Version 2 (HSDSD)