"Greening" and comfort conditions in transport infrastructure systems: Understanding users' preferences

被引:17
作者
Benoliel, Maria Ana [1 ]
Manso, Maria [1 ]
Ferreira, Patricia Dinis [1 ]
Silva, Cristina Matos [1 ]
Cruz, Carlos Oliveira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, CERIS, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture & Georesources, Av Rovisco Pais, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Green walls; Transport infrastructure; Passengers; Perceptions; Survey; Willingness-to-pay; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; ROOFS; SATISFACTION; FACADES; SCALES; WALLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107759
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Urban planners, policy makers and transport operators constantly search for ways to improve the environment of transport infrastructures. "Greening" solutions, such as green roofs and walls, are among the potential measures to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. The integration of greenery in the urban environment, including transport infrastructures, is shown to provide positive Net Present Values and to have several environmental, economic, and social benefits. Since users are forced to walk and wait in urban interfaces for a certain time, "greening" solutions may contribute to improve their psychological well-being and comfort. However, there is little evidence on the perceptions and the value attributed by users to these solutions. This paper intends to provide a unique perspective on users' perception and willingness-to-pay for comfort and "greening" solutions in transport interfaces. The proposed methodology aims to evaluate the feasibility of several scenarios, based on a questionnaire survey taken amongst railway users. The process starts with a pilot survey and preliminary interviews, followed by the definition of the target population and with both "in-situ" and online survey campaigns. The case-study is developed at Entrecampos Station, Lisbon, Portugal, where the survey was taken by 146 users. Results have shown that although users might attribute some value to having greener spaces in public transport interfaces, their willingness-to-pay is low and they show a preference for improvements such as more seats or safe and comfortable waiting areas. These conclusions may assist decision-making processes regarding infrastructure systems and urban greening.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Abou-Zeid M, 2010, CHOICE MODELLING: THE STATE-OF-THE-ART AND THE STATE-OF-PRACTICE, P289
  • [2] The effect of social comparisons on commute well-being
    Abou-Zeid, Maya
    Ben-Akiva, Moshe
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2011, 45 (04) : 345 - 361
  • [3] Green Walls, a Critical Review: Knowledge Gaps, Design Parameters, Thermal Performances and Multi-Criteria Design Approaches
    Ascione, Fabrizio
    De Masi, Rosa Francesca
    Mastellone, Margherita
    Ruggiero, Silvia
    Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (09)
  • [4] Bailey S., 2019, CNN HLTH, V60, P1
  • [5] Bass B., 2007, EVENT LONDON, V54, P461
  • [6] Probabilistic social cost-benefit analysis for green roofs: A lifecycle approach
    Bianchini, Fabricio
    Hewage, Kasun
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 58 : 152 - 162
  • [7] Cost-Effectiveness of Green Roofs
    Blackhurst, Michael
    Hendrickson, Chris
    Matthews, H. Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 16 (04) : 136 - 143
  • [8] Budiono O.K., 2009, Customer Satisfaction in Public Transport: A study of travellers' perception in Indonesia
  • [9] Camara municipal de Lisboa, 2020, LISBON EUROPEAN GREE, P1
  • [10] Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis of extensive vegetated roof systems
    Carter, Timothy
    Keeler, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 87 (03) : 350 - 363