Analysis and determination of the behavioral mechanism of rock bridges using experimental and numerical modeling of non-persistent rock joints

被引:25
作者
Zare, Sadegh [1 ]
Karimi-Nasab, Saeed [1 ]
Jalalifar, Hossein [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Bahonar Univ Kerman, Dept Min Engn, Kerman 7619637147, Iran
[2] Shahid Bahonar Univ Kerman, Dept Petr Engn, Kerman 7618868366, Iran
关键词
Rock bridges; Shear strength; Taguchi; Response surface; Laboratory experiment; Numerical modeling; BONDED-PARTICLE MODEL; SHEAR BEHAVIOR; IMPROVEMENTS; COALESCENCE; CALIBRATION; STRENGTH; FAILURE; CODE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104714
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Presence of rock bridges (RB) in natural non-persistent discontinuity sets is an effective factor on the stability of rock structures. Investigations show that the bearing capacity of jointed rocks is changed with variation of different joint parameters. Therefore, in order to investigate the effect of parameters such as contact area and number of rock bridges, normal load, angle, length, and number of joints on shear strength of non-persistent rock joints and also to recognize the interaction of these parameters on the mechanical behavior of joints, experimental design methods of Taguchi and central composite design (CCD) were used for the sample generation, testing and numerical modeling. The effective parameters on the shear strength of jointed samples were obtained based on the previous studies. Using the Taguchi method, 16 samples were tested at CNL condition and the effect of parameters such as normal stress, number, and area of rock bridges was investigated. To evaluate other joints parameters, 30 experiments were designed using CCD method and examined using numerical modeling. Using the analysis of variance (ANOVA), it was found that the obtained models are statistically significant. According to the results of ANOVA, the area of rock bridges and the angle of joints showed the highest and the lowest effect on shear strength of coplanar and non-coplanar jointed samples, respectively. The results displayed that the dominant failure for planar non-persistent joints is pure shear and a combination of tensile and shear cracks is created from the both tips of adjacent joints. Moreover, it was found that the dominant failure of non-coplanar joints is the combination of shear and tension. Bonded particle model (BPM) and smooth joint model (SJM) were also applied for numerical modeling. A new method was considered for applying SJ to the models, which solved the interlocking problem during the test.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MAN PD
[2]   Shear Strength and Cracking Process of Non-persistent Jointed Rocks: An Extensive Experimental Investigation [J].
Asadizadeh, Mostafa ;
Moosavi, Mahdi ;
Hossaini, Mohammad Farouq ;
Masoumi, Hossein .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2018, 51 (02) :415-428
[3]   Effect of Boundary Condition on the Shear Behaviour of Rock Joints in the Direct Shear Test [J].
Bahaaddini, M. .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2017, 50 (05) :1141-1155
[4]   Numerical Study of the Mechanical Behavior of Nonpersistent Jointed Rock Masses [J].
Bahaaddini, M. ;
Hagan, P. ;
Mitra, R. ;
Hebblewhite, B. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2016, 16 (01)
[5]   Numerical direct shear tests to model the shear behaviour of rock joints [J].
Bahaaddini, M. ;
Sharrock, G. ;
Hebblewhite, B. K. .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2013, 51 :101-115
[6]   Numerical investigation of the effect of joint geometrical parameters on the mechanical properties of a non-persistent jointed rock mass under uniaxial compression [J].
Bahaaddini, M. ;
Sharrock, G. ;
Hebblewhite, B. K. .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2013, 49 :206-225
[7]   FUNDAMENTALS OF ROCK JOINT DEFORMATION [J].
BANDIS, SC ;
LUMSDEN, AC ;
BARTON, NR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1983, 20 (06) :249-268
[8]   Fracture coalescence in rock-type materials under uniaxial and biaxial compression [J].
Bobet, A ;
Einstein, HH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1998, 35 (07) :863-888
[9]  
Broek D., 1986, ELEMENTARY ENG FRACT
[10]  
Brown E. T., 1970, J SOIL MECH FDN DIV, V96, P685, DOI [10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001411, DOI 10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001411]