The Effect of Response Format on the Psychometric Properties of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Consequences for Item Meaning and Factor Structure

被引:44
作者
Ackerman, Robert A. [1 ]
Donnellan, M. Brent [2 ]
Roberts, Brent W. [3 ]
Fraley, R. Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
narcissism; forced choice; Narcissistic Personality Inventory; factor analysis; response format; PATHOLOGICAL NARCISSISM; VALIDITY; NUMBER; COMPONENTS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1177/1073191114568113
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) is currently the most widely used measure of narcissism in social/personality psychology. It is also relatively unique because it uses a forced-choice response format. We investigate the consequences of changing the NPI's response format for item meaning and factor structure. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 40 forced-choice items (n = 2,754), 80 single-stimulus dichotomous items (i.e., separate true/false responses for each item; n = 2,275), or 80 single-stimulus rating scale items (i.e., 5-point Likert-type response scales for each item; n = 2,156). Analyses suggested that the narcissistic and nonnarcissistic response options from the Entitlement and Superiority subscales refer to independent personality dimensions rather than high and low levels of the same attribute. In addition, factor analyses revealed that although the Leadership dimension was evident across formats, dimensions with entitlement and superiority were not as robust. Implications for continued use of the NPI are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 220
页数:18
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Ackerman R. A., INVESTIGATING UNPUB
[2]   Evaluating Self-Report Measures of Narcissistic Entitlement [J].
Ackerman, Robert A. ;
Donnellan, M. Brent .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2013, 35 (04) :460-474
[3]   What Does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory Really Measure? [J].
Ackerman, Robert A. ;
Witt, Edward A. ;
Donnellan, M. Brent ;
Trzesniewski, Kali H. ;
Robins, Richard W. ;
Kashy, Deborah A. .
ASSESSMENT, 2011, 18 (01) :67-87
[4]   Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry: Disentangling the Bright and Dark Sides of Narcissism [J].
Back, Mitja D. ;
Kuefner, Albrecht C. P. ;
Dufner, Michael ;
Gerlach, Tanja M. ;
Rauthmann, John F. ;
Denissen, Jaap J. A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 105 (06) :1013-1037
[5]   COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE FORMATS FOR AN ABBREVIATED VERSION OF ROTTERS LOCUS OF CONTROL SCALE [J].
BARNETT, T ;
LANIER, PA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1995, 77 (01) :259-264
[6]   Increasing validity with forced-choice criterion measurement formats [J].
Bartram, Dave .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2007, 15 (03) :263-272
[7]   PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY AS A UNIFYING FRAMEWORK FOR 21ST CENTURY PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT [J].
Bornstein, Robert F. .
PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 27 (02) :133-152
[8]  
Brown R.P., 2011, The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments, P141, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118093108.CH12
[9]   On the Meaning and Measure of Narcissism [J].
Brown, Ryan P. ;
Budzek, Karolyn ;
Tamborski, Michael .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2009, 35 (07) :951-964
[10]   Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis [J].
Cain, Nicole M. ;
Pincus, Aaron L. ;
Ansell, Emily B. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 28 (04) :638-656