Bacteriologic and therapeutic considerations in intra-abdominal surgical infections

被引:5
作者
Giamarellou, H
Kanellakopoulou, K
机构
关键词
surgical infections; antibiotics; Bacteroides fragilis; peritonitis;
D O I
10.1006/anae.1997.0107
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The most important factor in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections are early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention while antibiotics play a secondary role. The goals of surgical procedures should be to stop peritoneal contamination, to debride necrotic tissue, to remove debris and foreign bodies and to drain any pus collection. Antibiotics should be initiated before surgery and they must encompass both colonic aerobes and anaerobes including Bacteroides fragilis group but not necessary Enterococcus sp. Antibacterial agents with pure activity against anaerobes include chloramphenicol, clindamycin and the nitroimidazoles while ampicillin/sulbactam, amoxicillin/clavulanate, ticarcillin/clavulanate, cefoxitin, cefotetan, ceftizoxime imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem and some advanced quinolones Like sparfloxacin, represent a single drug to cover both aerobic and anaerobic microflora. Although almost all clinical trials usually result in a 90% efficacy rate, the final outcome is dependant on the stage of the infection (early versus late), sepsis score, underlying diseases and the applied surgical procedures. On the other hand the choice of antibiotic(s) must be influenced by its toxicity, profile, local nosocomial susceptibility patterns, resistance inducing ability and price. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 212
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Anaerobic Infections in Humans
[2]   THE BACTERIOLOGY OF GANGRENOUS AND PERFORATED APPENDICITIS - REVISITED [J].
BENNION, RS ;
BARON, EJ ;
THOMPSON, JE ;
DOWNES, J ;
SUMMANEN, P ;
TALAN, DA ;
FINEGOLD, SM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 211 (02) :165-171
[3]   ANTIBIOTIC MANAGEMENT OF SURGICALLY TREATED GANGRENOUS OR PERFORATED APPENDICITIS - COMPARISON OF GENTAMICIN AND CLINDAMYCIN VERSUS CEFAMANDOLE VERSUS CEFOPERAZONE [J].
BERNE, TV ;
YELLIN, AW ;
APPLEMAN, MD ;
HESELTINE, PNR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 144 (01) :8-13
[4]  
BOHNEN JMA, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P83
[5]  
BOHNEN JMA, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V129, P33
[6]   PIPERACILLIN-TAZOBACTAM VERSUS IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN FOR TREATMENT OF INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS [J].
BRISMAR, B ;
MALMBORG, AS ;
TUNEVALL, G ;
WRETLIND, B ;
BERGMAN, L ;
MENTZING, LO ;
NYSTROM, PO ;
KIHLSTROM, E ;
BACKSTRAND, B ;
SKAU, T ;
KASHOLMTENGVE, B ;
SJOBERG, L ;
OLSSONLILJEQUIST, B ;
TALLY, FP ;
GATENBECK, L ;
EKLUND, AE ;
NORD, CE .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1992, 36 (12) :2766-2773
[7]   ENHANCEMENT OF GROWTH OF AEROBIC AND FACULTATIVE BACTERIA IN MIXED INFECTIONS WITH BACTEROIDES SPECIES [J].
BROOK, I .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 1985, 50 (03) :929-931
[8]  
CHRISTOU NV, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P193
[9]  
CONDON R, 1995, INF DIS CLIN PRAC S3, V4, P150
[10]  
CONDON RE, 1996, INF DIS CLIN PRAC S1, V5, P2