Evaluation of residents' delivery notes after a simulated shoulder dystocia

被引:45
作者
Deering, S
Poggi, S
Hodor, J
Macedomia, C
Satin, AJ
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Natl Naval Med Res Inst, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000137347.94987.01
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze delivery notes after a shoulder dystocia drill with a birthing simulator METHODS: A total of 33 residents from 2 university training programs underwent testing on a standardized shoulder,,r dystocia scenario with an obstetric birthing simulator. After the completion of the delivery, each resident was informed of the infant's Apgar scores and birth weight and told that the infant was moving all extremities. ne resident. was then given a blank progress note and asked to write a delivery note. The notes were evaluated for 15 key components. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent (n = 25) of residents recorded less than 10 of 15 key components of a delivery note after a shoulder dystocia. The majority of residents (91%, 30/33) included the correct order of the maneuvers used during the delivery, but most did not note which shoulder was anterior (18%, 6/33) or how long the head-to-body interval,vas during delivery (45%, 15/33). CONCLUSION: Residents' delivery notes after a shoulder dystocia simulation often lacked critical elements. Training in documentation is needed in residency training. The addition of the delivery note and feedback regarding the note represents a simple innovation in this teaching scenario that may help identify deficiencies in documentation. (C) 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 670
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
ACKER DB, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V78, P150
[2]   Improving resident competency in the management of shoulder dystocia with simulation training [J].
Deering, S ;
Poggi, S ;
Macedonia, C ;
Gherman, R ;
Satin, AJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (06) :1224-1228
[3]  
*ED COMM COUN RES, 2002, ED OBJ COR CURR RES
[4]   Professional liability - Storm warning [J].
Queenan, JT .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (02) :194-197
[5]  
RICHARDS BC, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P313
[6]  
STRUNK AL, 2000, ACOG CLIN REV, V5, P15
[7]   ANALYSIS OF 500 OBSTETRIC AND GYNECOLOGIC MALPRACTICE CLAIMS - CAUSES AND PREVENTION [J].
WARD, CJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 165 (02) :298-306