Empirical likelihood confidence intervals for adaptive cluster sampling

被引:4
作者
Salehi, Mohammad [1 ,2 ]
Mohammadi, Mohammad [1 ]
Rao, J. N. K. [3 ]
Berger, Yves G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Technol, Dept Math Sci, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
[2] SRTC, Tehran, Iran
[3] Carleton Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[4] Univ Southampton, Southampton Stat Sci Res Inst, Southampton S017 1BJ, Hants, England
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Finite population; Hansen-Hurwitz estimator; Horvitz-Thompson estimator; Empirical likelihood ratio; COMPLEX SURVEY DATA; AUXILIARY INFORMATION; ZERO VALUES; POPULATIONS; BOOTSTRAP;
D O I
10.1007/s10651-008-0105-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Adaptive cluster sampling (ACS) is an efficient sampling design for estimating parameters of rare and clustered populations. It is widely used in ecological research. The modified Hansen-Hurwitz (HH) and Horvitz-Thompson (HT) estimators based on small samples under ACS have often highly skewed distributions. In such situations, confidence intervals based on traditional normal approximation can lead to unsatisfactory results, with poor coverage properties. Christman and Pontius (Biometrics 56:503-510, 2000) showed that bootstrap percentile methods are appropriate for constructing confidence intervals from the HH estimator. But Perez and Pontius (J Stat Comput Simul 76:755-764, 2006) showed that bootstrap confidence intervals from the HT estimator are even worse than the normal approximation confidence intervals. In this article, we consider two pseudo empirical likelihood functions under the ACS design. One leads to the HH estimator and the other leads to a HT type estimator known as the Hajek estimator. Based on these two empirical likelihood functions, we derive confidence intervals for the population mean. Using a simulation study, we show that the confidence intervals obtained from the first EL function perform as good as the bootstrap confidence intervals from the HH estimator but the confidence intervals obtained from the second EL function perform much better than the bootstrap confidence intervals from the HT estimator, in terms of coverage rate.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 123
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap
  • [2] CHEN J, 2002, BIOMETRIKA, V55, P547
  • [3] Empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the mean of a population containing many zero values
    Chen, JH
    Chen, SY
    Rao, JNK
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2003, 31 (01): : 53 - 68
  • [4] Chen JH, 1999, STAT SINICA, V9, P385
  • [5] CHEN JH, 1993, BIOMETRIKA, V80, P107, DOI 10.1093/biomet/80.1.107
  • [6] Bootstrap confidence intervals for adaptive cluster sampling
    Christman, MC
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) : 503 - 510
  • [7] The application of adaptive cluster sampling for rare subtidal macroalgae
    Goldberg, Nisse A.
    Heine, John N.
    Brown, Jennifer A.
    [J]. MARINE BIOLOGY, 2007, 151 (04) : 1343 - 1348
  • [8] Gross S., 1980, P SECTION SURVEY RES, P181
  • [9] A NEW ESTIMATION THEORY FOR SAMPLE SURVEYS
    HARTLEY, HO
    RAO, JNK
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1968, 55 (03) : 547 - &
  • [10] Hjek J., 1971, Foundations of statistical inference, P236