Dashboards in Health Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review

被引:17
|
作者
Helminski, Danielle [1 ]
Kurlander, Jacob E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Renji, Anjana Deep [4 ]
Sussman, Jeremy B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pfeiffer, Paul N. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Conte, Marisa L. [4 ,6 ]
Gadabu, Oliver J. [4 ]
Kokaly, Alex N. [7 ]
Goldberg, Rebecca [8 ]
Ranusch, Allison [3 ]
Damschroder, Laura J. [3 ]
Landis-Lewis, Zach [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, NCRC Bldg 14,2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Learning Hlth Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Taubman Hlth Sci Lib, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] UCLA Hlth, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
dashboard; mHealth; medical informatics; quality improvement; scoping review; health care; Cochrane library; Cochrane; stakeholder; health care sector; digital health; design; end user; development; implementation; evaluation; user need; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.2196/34894
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health care organizations increasingly depend on business intelligence tools, including "dashboards," to capture, analyze, and present data on performance metrics. Ideally, dashboards allow users to quickly visualize actionable data to inform and optimize clinical and organizational performance. In reality, dashboards are typically embedded in complex health care organizations with massive data streams and end users with distinct needs. Thus, designing effective dashboards is a challenging task and theoretical underpinnings of health care dashboards are poorly characterized; even the concept of the dashboard remains ill-defined. Researchers, informaticists, clinical managers, and health care administrators will benefit from a clearer understanding of how dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated, and how the design, end user, and context influence their uptake and effectiveness. Objective: This scoping review first aims to survey the vast published literature of "dashboards" to describe where, why, and for whom they are used in health care settings, as well as how they are developed, implemented, and evaluated. Further, we will examine how dashboard design and content is informed by intended purpose and end users. Methods: In July 2020, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed literature using a targeted strategy developed with a research librarian and retrieved 5188 results. Following deduplication, 3306 studies were screened in duplicate for title and abstract. Any abstracts mentioning a health care dashboard were retrieved in full text and are undergoing duplicate review for eligibility. Articles will be included for data extraction and analysis if they describe the development, implementation, or evaluation of a dashboard that was successfully used in routine workflow. Articles will be excluded if they were published before 2015, the full text is unavailable, they are in a non-English language, or they describe dashboards used for public health tracking, in settings where direct patient care is not provided, or in undergraduate medical education. Any discrepancies in eligibility determination will be adjudicated by a third reviewer. We chose to focus on articles published after 2015 and those that describe dashboards that were successfully used in routine practice to identify the most recent and relevant literature to support future dashboard development in the rapidly evolving field of health care informatics. Results: All articles have undergone dual review for title and abstract, with a total of 2019 articles mentioning use of a health care dashboard retrieved in full text for further review. We are currently reviewing all full-text articles in duplicate. We aim to publish findings by mid-2022. Findings will be reported following guidance from the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. Conclusions: This scoping review will provide stakeholders with an overview of existing dashboard tools, highlighting the ways in which dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated in different settings and for different end user groups, and identify potential research gaps. Findings will guide efforts to design and use dashboards in the health care sector more effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors contributing to innovation readiness in health care organizations: a scoping review
    van den Hoed, Monique W.
    Backhaus, Ramona
    de Vries, Erica
    Hamers, Jan P. H.
    Daniels, Ramon
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [42] Nurses' perceptions of using volunteer support in health care settings: A systematic scoping review
    Crookes, Kate
    Saunders, Rosemary
    Kemp, Vivien
    Gallagher, Olivia
    Ghosh, Manonita
    Bulsara, Caroline
    Gullick, Karen
    O'Connell, Bev
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2023, 70 (03) : 405 - 414
  • [43] Trauma-Informed Care in Digital Health Technologies: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Abdulai, Abdul-Fatawu
    Naghdali, Hasti
    Ghirmay, Eden Tekie
    Adam, Fuseini
    Bawafaa, Eunice
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [44] Health Equity in Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Wang, Jonathan Xin
    Somani, Sulaiman
    Chen, Jonathan H.
    Murray, Sara
    Sarkar, Urmimala
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (09):
  • [45] Supporting the use of patient portals in mental health settings: a scoping review
    Zhang, Timothy
    Shen, Nelson
    Booth, Richard
    LaChance, Jessica
    Jackson, Brianna
    Strudwick, Gillian
    INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE, 2022, 47 (01) : 62 - 79
  • [46] Interactive Conversational Agents for Health Promotion, Prevention, and Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Scoping Review
    Sasseville, Maxime
    Sanchez, Romina H. Barony
    Yameogo, Achille R.
    Bergeron-Drolet, Laurie-Ann
    Bergeron, Frederic
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (10):
  • [47] Dysphagia screening in residential care settings: A scoping review
    Artiles, Constantino Estupinan
    Regan, Julie
    Donnellan, Claire
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2021, 114
  • [48] Quality Assessment of Digital Health Applications: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Giebel, Godwin Denk
    Schrader, Nils Frederik
    Speckemeier, Christian
    Abels, Carina
    Boerchers, Kirstin
    Wasem, Jurgen
    Blase, Nikola
    Neusser, Silke
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (07):
  • [49] Bioethics in Childbirth Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Ferreira, Graziani Izidoro
    Barbosa, Kevin Haley
    Duarte, Andre Di Carlo
    De Oliveira, Cesar
    Guilhem, Dirce
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (07):
  • [50] The Use of Telepsychiatry Services in Emergency Settings:Scoping Review
    Shalev, Ligat
    Eitan, Renana
    Rose, Adam J.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26