Dashboards in Health Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review

被引:16
|
作者
Helminski, Danielle [1 ]
Kurlander, Jacob E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Renji, Anjana Deep [4 ]
Sussman, Jeremy B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pfeiffer, Paul N. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Conte, Marisa L. [4 ,6 ]
Gadabu, Oliver J. [4 ]
Kokaly, Alex N. [7 ]
Goldberg, Rebecca [8 ]
Ranusch, Allison [3 ]
Damschroder, Laura J. [3 ]
Landis-Lewis, Zach [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, NCRC Bldg 14,2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Learning Hlth Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Taubman Hlth Sci Lib, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] UCLA Hlth, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
dashboard; mHealth; medical informatics; quality improvement; scoping review; health care; Cochrane library; Cochrane; stakeholder; health care sector; digital health; design; end user; development; implementation; evaluation; user need; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.2196/34894
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health care organizations increasingly depend on business intelligence tools, including "dashboards," to capture, analyze, and present data on performance metrics. Ideally, dashboards allow users to quickly visualize actionable data to inform and optimize clinical and organizational performance. In reality, dashboards are typically embedded in complex health care organizations with massive data streams and end users with distinct needs. Thus, designing effective dashboards is a challenging task and theoretical underpinnings of health care dashboards are poorly characterized; even the concept of the dashboard remains ill-defined. Researchers, informaticists, clinical managers, and health care administrators will benefit from a clearer understanding of how dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated, and how the design, end user, and context influence their uptake and effectiveness. Objective: This scoping review first aims to survey the vast published literature of "dashboards" to describe where, why, and for whom they are used in health care settings, as well as how they are developed, implemented, and evaluated. Further, we will examine how dashboard design and content is informed by intended purpose and end users. Methods: In July 2020, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed literature using a targeted strategy developed with a research librarian and retrieved 5188 results. Following deduplication, 3306 studies were screened in duplicate for title and abstract. Any abstracts mentioning a health care dashboard were retrieved in full text and are undergoing duplicate review for eligibility. Articles will be included for data extraction and analysis if they describe the development, implementation, or evaluation of a dashboard that was successfully used in routine workflow. Articles will be excluded if they were published before 2015, the full text is unavailable, they are in a non-English language, or they describe dashboards used for public health tracking, in settings where direct patient care is not provided, or in undergraduate medical education. Any discrepancies in eligibility determination will be adjudicated by a third reviewer. We chose to focus on articles published after 2015 and those that describe dashboards that were successfully used in routine practice to identify the most recent and relevant literature to support future dashboard development in the rapidly evolving field of health care informatics. Results: All articles have undergone dual review for title and abstract, with a total of 2019 articles mentioning use of a health care dashboard retrieved in full text for further review. We are currently reviewing all full-text articles in duplicate. We aim to publish findings by mid-2022. Findings will be reported following guidance from the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. Conclusions: This scoping review will provide stakeholders with an overview of existing dashboard tools, highlighting the ways in which dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated in different settings and for different end user groups, and identify potential research gaps. Findings will guide efforts to design and use dashboards in the health care sector more effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings
    Sprague, Sheila
    Scott, Taryn
    Garibaldi, Alisha
    Bzovsky, Sofia
    Slobogean, Gerard P.
    McKay, Paula
    Spurr, Hayley
    Arseneau, Erika
    Memon, Muzammil
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Swaminathan, Aparna
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [42] The Use of Case Studies in Systems Implementations Within Health Care Settings: A Scoping Review
    Gill, Rav
    Borycki, Elizabeth M.
    BUILDING CAPACITY FOR HEALTH INFORMATICS IN THE FUTURE, 2017, 234 : 142 - 149
  • [43] Case-Mix Classification for Mental Health Care in Community Settings: A Scoping Review
    Tran, Nam
    Poss, Jeffrey W.
    Perlman, Christopher
    Hirdes, John P.
    HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2019, 12
  • [44] Summarizing recommendations to eliminate weight stigma in prenatal health care settings: A scoping review
    Nagpal, Taniya S.
    Liu, Rebecca H.
    Gaudet, Laura
    Cook, Jocelynn L.
    Adamo, Kristi B.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (11) : 2214 - 2223
  • [45] Linkages between health systems and communities for chronic care: a scoping review protocol
    George, Nicole C.
    Radman, Dennis
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    Boivin, Antoine
    Ahmed, Sara
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [46] A protocol for a scoping review of equity measurement in mental health care for children and youth
    Gardner, William
    Nicholls, Stuart G.
    Reid, Graham J.
    Hutton, Brian
    Hamel, Candyce
    Sikora, Lindsey
    Salamatmanesh, Mina
    Duncan, Laura
    Georgiades, Katholiki
    Gilliland, Jason
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [47] A protocol for a scoping review of equity measurement in mental health care for children and youth
    William Gardner
    Stuart G. Nicholls
    Graham J. Reid
    Brian Hutton
    Candyce Hamel
    Lindsey Sikora
    Mina Salamatmanesh
    Laura Duncan
    Katholiki Georgiades
    Jason Gilliland
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [48] Perspectives of People Living with HIV on Access to Health Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Asghari, Shabnam
    Maybank, Allison
    Hurley, Oliver
    Modir, Hilary
    Farrell, Alison
    Marshall, Zack
    Kendall, Claire
    Johnston, Sharon
    Hogel, Matthew
    Rourke, Sean B.
    Liddy, Clare
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2016, 5 (02):
  • [49] Health Equity in Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Wang, Jonathan Xin
    Somani, Sulaiman
    Chen, Jonathan H.
    Murray, Sara
    Sarkar, Urmimala
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (09):
  • [50] Oral health care and living environment for older people: a scoping review protocol
    Talla, Pascaline Kengne
    Rodrigues, Anisha
    Hachey, Shauna
    Affoo, Rebecca
    Basiren, Quentin
    Bouferguene, Sabrina
    Syed, Mahidul
    Emami, Elham
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (02) : 314 - 324