Dashboards in Health Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review

被引:17
|
作者
Helminski, Danielle [1 ]
Kurlander, Jacob E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Renji, Anjana Deep [4 ]
Sussman, Jeremy B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pfeiffer, Paul N. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Conte, Marisa L. [4 ,6 ]
Gadabu, Oliver J. [4 ]
Kokaly, Alex N. [7 ]
Goldberg, Rebecca [8 ]
Ranusch, Allison [3 ]
Damschroder, Laura J. [3 ]
Landis-Lewis, Zach [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, NCRC Bldg 14,2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Learning Hlth Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Taubman Hlth Sci Lib, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] UCLA Hlth, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
dashboard; mHealth; medical informatics; quality improvement; scoping review; health care; Cochrane library; Cochrane; stakeholder; health care sector; digital health; design; end user; development; implementation; evaluation; user need; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.2196/34894
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health care organizations increasingly depend on business intelligence tools, including "dashboards," to capture, analyze, and present data on performance metrics. Ideally, dashboards allow users to quickly visualize actionable data to inform and optimize clinical and organizational performance. In reality, dashboards are typically embedded in complex health care organizations with massive data streams and end users with distinct needs. Thus, designing effective dashboards is a challenging task and theoretical underpinnings of health care dashboards are poorly characterized; even the concept of the dashboard remains ill-defined. Researchers, informaticists, clinical managers, and health care administrators will benefit from a clearer understanding of how dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated, and how the design, end user, and context influence their uptake and effectiveness. Objective: This scoping review first aims to survey the vast published literature of "dashboards" to describe where, why, and for whom they are used in health care settings, as well as how they are developed, implemented, and evaluated. Further, we will examine how dashboard design and content is informed by intended purpose and end users. Methods: In July 2020, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed literature using a targeted strategy developed with a research librarian and retrieved 5188 results. Following deduplication, 3306 studies were screened in duplicate for title and abstract. Any abstracts mentioning a health care dashboard were retrieved in full text and are undergoing duplicate review for eligibility. Articles will be included for data extraction and analysis if they describe the development, implementation, or evaluation of a dashboard that was successfully used in routine workflow. Articles will be excluded if they were published before 2015, the full text is unavailable, they are in a non-English language, or they describe dashboards used for public health tracking, in settings where direct patient care is not provided, or in undergraduate medical education. Any discrepancies in eligibility determination will be adjudicated by a third reviewer. We chose to focus on articles published after 2015 and those that describe dashboards that were successfully used in routine practice to identify the most recent and relevant literature to support future dashboard development in the rapidly evolving field of health care informatics. Results: All articles have undergone dual review for title and abstract, with a total of 2019 articles mentioning use of a health care dashboard retrieved in full text for further review. We are currently reviewing all full-text articles in duplicate. We aim to publish findings by mid-2022. Findings will be reported following guidance from the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. Conclusions: This scoping review will provide stakeholders with an overview of existing dashboard tools, highlighting the ways in which dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated in different settings and for different end user groups, and identify potential research gaps. Findings will guide efforts to design and use dashboards in the health care sector more effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Tina Quasdorf
    Lauren Clack
    Franziska Laporte Uribe
    Daniela Holle
    Martin Berwig
    Daniel Purwins
    Marie-Therese Schultes
    Martina Roes
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [32] Implementing Trauma-Informed Care-Settings, Definitions, Interventions, Measures, and Implementation across Settings: A Scoping Review
    Berring, Lene Lauge
    Holm, Tine
    Hansen, Jens Peter
    Delcomyn, Christian Lie
    Sondergaard, Rikke
    Hvidhjelm, Jacob
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [33] Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Quasdorf, Tina
    Clack, Lauren
    Laporte Uribe, Franziska
    Holle, Daniela
    Berwig, Martin
    Purwins, Daniel
    Schultes, Marie-Therese
    Roes, Martina
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [34] Strategies and settings of clinical pharmacogenetic implementation: a scoping review of pharmacogenetics programs
    Luczak, Tiana
    Brown, Sarah Jane
    Armbruster, Danielle
    Hundertmark, Megan
    Brown, Jacob
    Stenehjem, David
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2021, 22 (06) : 345 - 364
  • [35] Lean bundles in health care: a scoping review
    Abdallah, Ayman Bahjat
    Alkhaldi, Rasha Zuhair
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (04) : 488 - 510
  • [36] Remote leadership in health care: a scoping review
    Kiljunen, Mari
    Laukka, Elina
    Koskela, Tarja K.
    Kanste, Outi Ilona
    LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2022, 35 (01) : 98 - 115
  • [37] Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes
    Chadborn, Neil H.
    Devi, Reena
    Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
    Banerjee, Jay
    Gordon, Adam L.
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (01) : 17 - 26
  • [38] Virtual team-based care planning with older persons in formal care settings: a scoping review protocol
    Gao, Harrison
    Yous, Marie-Lee
    Connelly, Denise
    Hung, Lillian
    Garnett, Anna
    Hay, Melissa Erin
    Snobelen, Nancy
    Salatino, Samantha
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [39] Adolescent cancer prevention in rural, pediatric primary care settings in the United States: A scoping review
    Ryan, Grace W.
    Whitmire, Paula
    Batten, Annabelle
    Goulding, Melissa
    Nelson, Becky Baltich
    Lemon, Stephenie C.
    Pbert, Lori
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2023, 36
  • [40] Conceptualizing Interprofessional Digital Communication and Collaboration in Health Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Nordmann, Kim
    Sauter, Stefanie
    Moebius-Lerch, Patricia
    Redlich, Marie-Christin
    Schaller, Michael
    Fischer, Florian
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12