Dashboards in Health Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review

被引:17
|
作者
Helminski, Danielle [1 ]
Kurlander, Jacob E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Renji, Anjana Deep [4 ]
Sussman, Jeremy B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pfeiffer, Paul N. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Conte, Marisa L. [4 ,6 ]
Gadabu, Oliver J. [4 ]
Kokaly, Alex N. [7 ]
Goldberg, Rebecca [8 ]
Ranusch, Allison [3 ]
Damschroder, Laura J. [3 ]
Landis-Lewis, Zach [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, NCRC Bldg 14,2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Learning Hlth Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Taubman Hlth Sci Lib, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] UCLA Hlth, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
dashboard; mHealth; medical informatics; quality improvement; scoping review; health care; Cochrane library; Cochrane; stakeholder; health care sector; digital health; design; end user; development; implementation; evaluation; user need; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.2196/34894
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health care organizations increasingly depend on business intelligence tools, including "dashboards," to capture, analyze, and present data on performance metrics. Ideally, dashboards allow users to quickly visualize actionable data to inform and optimize clinical and organizational performance. In reality, dashboards are typically embedded in complex health care organizations with massive data streams and end users with distinct needs. Thus, designing effective dashboards is a challenging task and theoretical underpinnings of health care dashboards are poorly characterized; even the concept of the dashboard remains ill-defined. Researchers, informaticists, clinical managers, and health care administrators will benefit from a clearer understanding of how dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated, and how the design, end user, and context influence their uptake and effectiveness. Objective: This scoping review first aims to survey the vast published literature of "dashboards" to describe where, why, and for whom they are used in health care settings, as well as how they are developed, implemented, and evaluated. Further, we will examine how dashboard design and content is informed by intended purpose and end users. Methods: In July 2020, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed literature using a targeted strategy developed with a research librarian and retrieved 5188 results. Following deduplication, 3306 studies were screened in duplicate for title and abstract. Any abstracts mentioning a health care dashboard were retrieved in full text and are undergoing duplicate review for eligibility. Articles will be included for data extraction and analysis if they describe the development, implementation, or evaluation of a dashboard that was successfully used in routine workflow. Articles will be excluded if they were published before 2015, the full text is unavailable, they are in a non-English language, or they describe dashboards used for public health tracking, in settings where direct patient care is not provided, or in undergraduate medical education. Any discrepancies in eligibility determination will be adjudicated by a third reviewer. We chose to focus on articles published after 2015 and those that describe dashboards that were successfully used in routine practice to identify the most recent and relevant literature to support future dashboard development in the rapidly evolving field of health care informatics. Results: All articles have undergone dual review for title and abstract, with a total of 2019 articles mentioning use of a health care dashboard retrieved in full text for further review. We are currently reviewing all full-text articles in duplicate. We aim to publish findings by mid-2022. Findings will be reported following guidance from the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. Conclusions: This scoping review will provide stakeholders with an overview of existing dashboard tools, highlighting the ways in which dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated in different settings and for different end user groups, and identify potential research gaps. Findings will guide efforts to design and use dashboards in the health care sector more effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Electronic health records for integrated mental health care: protocol for a scoping review
    Kariotis, Timothy
    Prictor, Megan
    Gray, Kathleen
    Chang, Shanton
    ADVANCES IN MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 19 (01) : 63 - 74
  • [22] Clarifying contemporary conceptualizations of allyship with LGBTQ2S+groups in the context of health care or health settings: a scoping review protocol
    Handlovsky, Ingrid
    Marcellus, Lenora
    Newton, Lorelei
    Zakher, Bernadette
    Mussell, Jessica
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (12) : 2429 - 2437
  • [23] Developing public health surveillance dashboards: a scoping review on the design principles
    Rabiei, Reza
    Bastani, Peivand
    Ahmadi, Hossein
    Dehghan, Shirin
    Almasi, Sohrab
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] Person-Generated Health Data in Women's Health: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Karim, Jalisa Lynn
    Talhouk, Aline
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (05):
  • [25] Protocols for breaking bad news in health care: a scoping review protocol
    Cardoso, Ana Filipa
    Rosendo, Ines
    Santiago, Luiz
    Neto, Joana
    Cardoso, Daniela
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (11) : 2411 - 2418
  • [26] Developing public health surveillance dashboards: a scoping review on the design principles
    Reza Rabiei
    Peivand Bastani
    Hossein Ahmadi
    Shirin Dehghan
    Sohrab Almasi
    BMC Public Health, 24
  • [27] yTelemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Guinemer, Camille
    Boeker, Martin
    Weiss, Bjoern
    Fuerstenau, Daniel
    Balzer, Felix
    Poncette, Akira-Sebastian
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2020, 9 (12):
  • [28] Professional representation of conversational agents for health care: a scoping review protocol
    MacNeill, A. Luke
    MacNeill, Lillian
    Doucet, Shelley
    Luke, Alison
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (02) : 666 - 673
  • [29] National Monitoring and Evaluation of Health IT: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Villumsen, Sidsel
    Nohr, Christian
    BUILDING CAPACITY FOR HEALTH INFORMATICS IN THE FUTURE, 2017, 234 : 352 - 357
  • [30] Artificial Intelligence Applications in Health Care Practice: Scoping Review
    Sharma, Malvika
    Savage, Carl
    Nair, Monika
    Larsson, Ingrid
    Svedberg, Petra
    Nygren, Jens M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (10)