Integrated Assessment of the Environmental and Economic Effects of Resource Utilization Process for Lime/Gypsum Flue Gas Desulfurization Collaborative Desulfurized Gypsum

被引:16
作者
Xia, Xiao [1 ]
Zhang, Liqiang [1 ]
Yuan, Xueliang [1 ]
Ma, Chunyuan [1 ]
Song, Zhanlong [1 ]
Zhao, Xiqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Natl Engn Lab Reducing Emiss Coal Combust, Engn Res Ctr Environm Thermal Technol,Minist Educ, Sch Energy & Power Engn,Shandong Key Lab Energy C, Jinan 250061, Peoples R China
关键词
FGD; desulfurization gypsum; life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; reduction; REDUCTIVE DECOMPOSITION; ELEMENTAL SULFUR; CALCIUM-SULFATE; CARBON-MONOXIDE; SO2; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1089/ees.2020.0424
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To solve the problems of difficult treatment of desulfurized gypsum and overmining of limestone, a kind of lime/gypsum flue gas desulfurization (FGD) collaborative desulfurized gypsum resource utilization process (LCS) was proposed. The system mainly includes the LCS-LFGD (lime/gypsum flue gas desulfurization system), LCS-C (desulfurized gypsum reduction calcining process), and carbon monoxide-coupled activated carbon reduction of SO2 to sulfur process (LCS-S). Taking a typical wet FGD unit of 300 MW power plant in China as an example, the limestone/gypsum flue gas desulfurization system (L-FGD) process was compared with the LCS by using the method of life cycle assessment and life cycle cost (LCC). The result shows that the overall environmental impact of the LCS is 0.2913. The environmental impacts of LCS-LFGD, LCS-C, and LCS-S were 0.1322, 0.1543, and 0.0048, respectively. Both LCS-LFGD and LCS-C are the key processes in this case study, and electricity consumption and coal gas consumption are the key substances in each key process. LCC analysis showed that although the initial investment of LCS was 4.32 x 10(6) USD similar to 5.76 x 10(6) USD more compared with L-FGD, the running cost of LCS was 1.41 x 10(6) USD per year lower compared with L-FGD. Besides, the cost of ore mining, the quality of calcined products, and environmental protection policy will affect the financial cost of the process.
引用
收藏
页码:886 / 898
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Environmental impact of a coal combustion-desulphurisation plant:: Abatement capacity of desulphurisation process and environmental characterisation of combustion by-products [J].
Alvarez-Ayuso, E. ;
Querol, X. ;
Tomas, A. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2006, 65 (11) :2009-2017
[2]  
[储益萍 CHU Yiping], 2008, [环境科学与技术, Enuivonmental Science and Technology], V31, P86
[3]   Integrated assessment of the environmental and economic effects of an ultra-clean flue gas treatment process in coal-fired power plant [J].
Cui, Lin ;
Li, Yue ;
Tang, Yuzhou ;
Shi, Yifei ;
Wang, Qingsong ;
Yuan, Xueliang ;
Kellett, Jon .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 199 :359-368
[4]   A procedure for evaluating the most environmentally sound alternative between two on-site small-scale wastewater treatment systems [J].
De Feo, G. ;
Ferrara, C. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 :124-136
[5]  
Deng S., 2015, J ENV ENG TECHNOL, V5, P186
[6]  
DePriest W., 2003, P COMB POW PLANT AIR
[7]   REDUCTIVE DECOMPOSITION OF CALCIUM-SULFATE UTILIZING CARBON-MONOXIDE AND HYDROGEN [J].
DIAZBOSSIO, LM ;
SQUIER, SE ;
PULSIFER, AH .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1985, 40 (03) :319-324
[8]   Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of flue gas desulphurization technologies in China [J].
Feng, Chao ;
Gao, Xuenong ;
Tang, Yuting ;
Zhang, Yuansheng .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 68 :81-92
[9]   Reduction of SO2 to elemental sulfur with H2 and mixed H2/CO gas in an activated carbon bed [J].
Feng, Tai ;
Huo, Mengjia ;
Zhao, Xiqiang ;
Wang, Tao ;
Xia, Xiao ;
Ma, Chunyuan .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2017, 121 :191-199
[10]   Reduction of SO2 with CO to Elemental Sulfur in Activated Carbon Bed [J].
Feng, Tai ;
Zhao, Xiqiang ;
Wang, Tao ;
Xia, Xiao ;
Zhang, Mengze ;
Huan, Qingchao ;
Ma, Chunyuan .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (08) :6578-6584