Firm Actions to Develop an Ambidextrous Sales Force

被引:25
作者
Panagopoulos, Nikolaos G. [1 ]
Rapp, Adam [1 ]
Pimentel, Michael A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, Coll Business, Dept Mkt, Ralph & Luci Schey Sales Ctr, 209 Copeland Hall, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Collage Sch Business, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
sales force; ambidexterity; service; KSA; MOA; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; MARKET ORIENTATION; METHOD VARIANCE; MONTE-CARLO; PERFORMANCE; SERVICE; KNOWLEDGE; ANTECEDENTS; MOTIVATION; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1177/1094670519883348
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While research on employee ambidexterity is growing, there is little investigation on what firms can do to enhance their competitiveness in this space. Leveraging a human resource lens, we advance a comprehensive model depicting three firm-level ambidexterities as key performance drivers that can help firms achieve bottom-line outcomes. Specifically, we focus on (1) ambidexterity in skill-enhancing practices (i.e., selection, training), which ensure employees have relevant service-sales knowledge, skills, and abilities; (2) ambidexterity in motivation-enhancing practices (i.e., metrics, incentives), which help motivate employees to perform service-sales activities; and (3) ambidexterity in opportunity-enhancing practices (i.e., data, tools use), which enable employees to perform service-sales activities. Our findings suggest that ambidextrous firms-or those that balance service- and sales-related elements when implementing their systems and processes-enjoy greater sales force and firm financial performance. Finally, we test boundary conditions for these relationships and find that competitive intensity enhances the positive effects of all ambidexterity constructs. We conclude with implications for theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 104
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   PERSPECTIVES ON BEHAVIOR-BASED VERSUS OUTCOME-BASED SALESFORCE CONTROL-SYSTEMS [J].
ANDERSON, E ;
OLIVER, RL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1987, 51 (04) :76-88
[2]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[3]  
Anderson R. E., 2010, Multivariate Data Analysis
[4]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[5]   The effects of customer acquisition and retention orientations on a firm's radical and incremental innovation performance [J].
Arnold, Todd J. ;
Fang, Eric ;
Palmatier, Robert W. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (02) :234-251
[6]  
Babakus E., 1996, International Journal of Research in Marketing, V13, P345, DOI [10.1016/S0167-8116(96)00016-X, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8116(96)00016-X]
[7]  
Bailey EE., 2003, Manag Decis Econ, V24, P347, DOI [DOI 10.1002/MDE.1119, 10.1002/mde.1119]
[8]   A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study [J].
Chin, WW ;
Marcolin, BL ;
Newsted, PR .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (02) :189-217
[9]  
Chin WW, 2012, MIS QUART, V36, P1003
[10]   THE DETERMINANTS OF SALESPERSON PERFORMANCE - A META-ANALYSIS [J].
CHURCHILL, GA ;
FORD, NM ;
HARTLEY, SW ;
WALKER, OC .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1985, 22 (02) :103-118