The subjective evaluation of task switch cues is related to voluntary task switching

被引:10
作者
Vermeylen, L. [1 ]
Braem, S. [1 ]
Notebaert, W. [1 ]
Ruitenberg, M. F. L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Psychol, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Neuropsychol, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Inst Brain & Cognit, Leiden, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Cognitive control; Task switching; Negative affect; Avoidance; Effort evaluation; SPECTRUM QUOTIENT AQ; DECISION-MAKING; COGNITIVE CONTROL; MENTAL-DISORDERS; AUTISM; INTERFERENCE; ACTIVATION; AVOIDANCE; CONFLICTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105063
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Task switching refers to the effortful mental process of shifting attention between different tasks. While it is well established that task switching usually comes with an objective performance cost, recent studies have shown that people also subjectively evaluate task switching as negative. An open question is whether this affective evaluation of task switching is also related to actual decision making. In this pre-registered study, we therefore examined whether individual differences in the negative evaluation of task switch cues are related to less voluntary task switching. To this end, participants first performed a cued task switching paradigm where abstract cues signaled task transitions (repetition or alternation). In a second phase, these transition cues were used as prime stimuli in an affective priming procedure to assess participants' affective evaluation of task switching. In a third phase, participants were allowed to freely choose whether to switch or repeat tasks. We found that a more negative evaluation of task switching cues was related to lower switch rates in the voluntary task switching phase. This finding supports neuroeconomic theories of value-based decision making which suggest that people use their subjective value of control to decide whether to engage in (different) tasks.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[21]   The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism [J].
Geurts, Hilde M. ;
Corbett, Blythe ;
Solomon, Marjorie .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 13 (02) :74-82
[22]   Dysfunctions of decision-making and cognitive control as transdiagnostic mechanisms of mental disorders: advances, gaps, and needs in current research [J].
Goschke, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2014, 23 :41-57
[23]   Motivation and cognitive control in depression [J].
Grahek, Ivan ;
Shenhav, Amitai ;
Musslick, Sebastian ;
Krebs, Ruth M. ;
Koster, Ernst H. W. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2019, 102 :371-381
[24]  
Haines N., 2020, PREPRINT, DOI DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/XR7Y3
[25]   The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences [J].
Hedge, Craig ;
Powell, Georgina ;
Sumner, Petroc .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (03) :1166-1186
[26]   Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): A study in dutch population and patient groups [J].
Hoekstra, Rosa A. ;
Bartels, Meike ;
Cath, Danielle C. ;
Boomsma, Dorret I. .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2008, 38 (08) :1555-1566
[27]   Task switching in autism: An EEG study on intentions and actions [J].
Hoofs, Vincent ;
Princen, Myrthe M. ;
Poljac, Ervin ;
Stolk, Arjen ;
Poljac, Edita .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2018, 117 :398-407
[28]  
Hughes S., PsyArXiv, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/d5zn8, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/D5ZN8]
[29]   Control and Interference in Task Switching-A Review [J].
Kiesel, Andrea ;
Steinhauser, Marco ;
Wendt, Mike ;
Falkenstein, Michael ;
Jost, Kerstin ;
Philipp, Andrea M. ;
Koch, Iring .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2010, 136 (05) :849-874
[30]   A Labor/Leisure Tradeoff in Cognitive Control [J].
Kool, Wouter ;
Botvinick, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2014, 143 (01) :131-141