Validation of the new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus on a patient cohort from a national referral center: a retrospective study

被引:10
作者
Bakula, Marija [1 ]
Cikes, Nada [2 ,3 ]
Anic, Branimir [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Univ Hosp Ctr Zagreb, Div Clin Immunol & Rheumatol,Dept Internal Med, Kispaticeva 12, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Ctr Translat & Clin Res, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Univ Hosp Ctr Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
COLLEGE-OF-RHEUMATOLOGY; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATING CLINICS; WEIGHTED CRITERIA; REAL-LIFE; DISEASE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3325/cmj.2019.60.333
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To validate Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-12 and American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-97 classification criteria on a patient cohort from the University Hospital Center Zagreb. Methods This retrospective study, conducted from 2014 to 2016, involved 308 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n = 146) and SLE-allied conditions (n = 162). Patients' medical charts were evaluated by an expert rheumatologist to confirm the clinical diagnosis, regardless of the number of the ACR-97 criteria met. Overall sensitivity and specificity, as well as the sensitivity and specificity according to disease duration, were compared between ACR97 and SLICC-12 classifications. Predictive value for SLE for both classifications was assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results The SLICC-12 criteria had significantly higher sensitivity in early disase, which increased with disease duration. The ACR-97 criteria had higher specificity. The specificity of the SLICC-12 criteria was low and decreased with disease duration. Regression analysis demonstrated the superiority of the SLICC-12 classification criteria over the ACR-97 criteria, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.801 and 0.780, respectively. Conclusion Although the SLICC-12 criteria were superior to the ACR-97 and were more sensitive for diagnosing early SLE, their specificity in our population was too low. The sensitivity of the SLICC-12 classification is increased by better defined clinical features within each criterion. Our results contribute to the current initiative for developing new criteria for SLE.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 344
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] ABERLE T, 2017, LUPUS SCI MED, V4, DOI DOI 10.1177/0961203316657434
  • [2] Distinctions Between Diagnostic and Classification Criteria?
    Aggarwal, Rohit
    Ringold, Sarah
    Khanna, Dinesh
    Neogi, Tuhina
    Johnson, Sindhu R.
    Miller, Amy
    Brunner, Hermine I.
    Ogawa, Rikke
    Felson, David
    Ogdie, Alexis
    Aletaha, Daniel
    Feldman, Brian M.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2015, 67 (07) : 891 - 897
  • [3] Development of SLE among "potential SLE" patients seen in consultation: long-term follow-up
    Al Daabil, M.
    Massarotti, E. M.
    Fine, A.
    Tsao, H.
    Ho, P.
    Schur, P. H.
    Bermas, B. L.
    Costenbader, K. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 68 (12) : 1508 - 1513
  • [4] Alarcon-Segovia D., 2004, SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTH, P93
  • [5] Performance of the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics and the 1997 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Real-Life Scenario
    Amezcua-Guerra, Luis M.
    Higuera-Ortiz, Violeta
    Arteaga-Garcia, Ulises
    Gallegos-Nava, Selma
    Huebbe-Tena, Claudia
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2015, 67 (03) : 437 - 441
  • [6] Anic B, 2008, ZAGREB, P1386
  • [7] New classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus correlate with disease activity
    Anic, Felina
    Zuvic-Butorac, Marta
    Stimac, Davor
    Novak, Srdan
    [J]. CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (05) : 514 - 519
  • [8] [Anonymous], S.f
  • [9] Bertsias G, 2012, EULAR, P476
  • [10] Bobin C., APPL RADIAT ISOTOPES, V109, P405, DOI [10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.12.029, DOI 10.1016/J.APRADISO.2015.12.029]