Classification of hyperspectral data by decision trees and artificial neural networks to identify weed stress and nitrogen status of corn

被引:185
作者
Goel, PK
Prasher, SO
Patel, RM
Landry, JA
Bonnell, RB
Viau, AA
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Agr & Biosyst Engn, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ H9X 3V9, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Fac Foresterie & Geomat, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
remote sensing; hyperspectral; classification; decision tree; artificial neural networks; corn; nitrogen; weeds;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-1699(03)00020-6
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the potential of decision tree classification algorithms for the classification of hyperspectral data, with the goal of discriminating between different growth scenarios in a cornfield. A comparison was also made between decision tree and artificial neural networks (ANNs) classification accuracies. In the summer of the year 2000, a two-factor field experiment representing different crop conditions was carried out. Corn was grown under four weed management strategies: no weed control, control of grasses, control of broadleaf weeds, and full weed control with nitrogen levels of 60, 120, and 250 N kg/ha. Hyperspectral data using a Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager were acquired three times during the entire growing season. Decision tree technology was applied to classify different treatments based on the hyperspectral data. Various tree-growing mechanisms were used to improve the accuracy of classification. Misclassification rates of detecting all the combinations of different nitrogen and weed categories were 43, 32, and 40% for hyperspectral data sets obtained at the initial growth, the tasseling and the full maturity stages, respectively. However, satisfactory classification results were obtained when one factor (nitrogen or weed) was considered at a time. In this case, misclassification rates were only 22 and 18% for nitrogen and weeds, respectively, for the data obtained at the tasseling stage. Slightly better results were obtained by following the ANN approach. However, the advantage with the decision tree was the formulation of simple and clear classification rules. The highest accuracy was obtained for the data acquired at tasseling stage. The results indicate the potential of decision tree classification algorithms and ANN usage in the classification of hyperspectral data for crop condition assessment. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 93
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fusion neural networks for plant classification: learning to combine RGB, hyperspectral, and lidar data
    Scholl, Victoria M.
    McGlinchy, Joseph
    Price-Broncucia, Teo
    Balch, Jennifer K.
    Joseph, Maxwell B.
    PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [32] Multimodal Attention-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data
    Zhang, Haotian
    Yao, Jing
    Ni, Li
    Gao, Lianru
    Huang, Min
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 16 : 3635 - 3644
  • [33] Artificial neural networks and decision tree classification for predicting soil drainage classes in Denmark
    Beucher, A.
    Moller, A. B.
    Greve, M. H.
    GEODERMA, 2019, 352 : 351 - 359
  • [34] Estimation of corn yield using multi-temporal optical and radar satellite data and artificial neural networks
    Fieuzal, R.
    Sicre, C. Marais
    Baup, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2017, 57 : 14 - 23
  • [35] A Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Decision Trees with Logistic Regression as Classification Models for Breast Cancer Survival
    Mudunuru, Venkateswara Rao
    Skrzypek, Leslaw A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2020, 5 (06) : 1170 - 1190
  • [36] Using Artificial Neural Networks and Remotely Sensed Data to Evaluate the Relative Importance of Variables for Prediction of Within-Field Corn and Soybean Yields
    Kross, Angela
    Znoj, Evelyn
    Callegari, Daihany
    Kaur, Gurpreet
    Sunohara, Mark
    Lapen, David R.
    McNairn, Heather
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [37] Soil texture classification with artificial neural networks operating on remote sensing data
    Zhai, Yushun
    Thomasson, J. Alex
    Boggess, Julian E., III
    Sui, Ruixiu
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2006, 54 (02) : 53 - 68
  • [38] Evolving Artificial Neural Networks Using Butterfly Optimization Algorithm for Data Classification
    Jalali, Seyed Mohammad Jafar
    Ahmadian, Sajad
    Kebria, Parham M.
    Khosravi, Abbas
    Lim, Chee Peng
    Nahavandi, Saeid
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICONIP 2019), PT I, 2019, 11953 : 596 - 607
  • [39] APPLICATION OF NON-LINEAR PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS TO HYPERSPECTRAL DATA FOR NOISE FILTERING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
    Piscini, A.
    Licciardi, G.
    2014 6TH WORKSHOP ON HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING: EVOLUTION IN REMOTE SENSING (WHISPERS), 2014,
  • [40] Retrieving fPAR of maize canopy using artificial neural networks with airborne LiDAR and hyperspectral data
    Shi, Juncheng
    Wang, Cheng
    Xi, Xiaohuan
    Yang, Xuebo
    Wang, Jinliang
    Ding, Xue
    REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2020, 11 (11) : 1002 - 1011