The strange case of cultural services: Limits of the ecosystem services paradigm

被引:85
作者
Winthrop, Robert H. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDI Bur Land Management, Socioecon Program WO 210, Washington, DC 20003 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; Culture; Environmental value; Native North America; Stewardship; Sustainability science; HERITAGE VALUES; VALUATION; CONSERVATION; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
As interest in the concept of ecosystem services (ES) has grown, so has its scope. This paper considers some limitations of the ES paradigm by examining one category of ES: cultural services, including the environmental basis for esthetic, spiritual, and recreational experiences, cultural heritage, sense of place, and ways of life. It examines whether cultural ES can be assessed in terms of purely individual benefits or if social/collective considerations must be included; and whether the concept of 'services' even provides an appropriate framework for understanding such values. To pursue these questions I consider the recent literature on the assessment and valuation of 'cultural services' and assess the adequacy of this perspective against several examples from American Indian communities of the Pacific Northwest. Three characteristics of these situations from Indian Country are problematic for an ES framework: the social construction of environmental experience, the symbolic character of environmental knowledge, and the multidimensionality of environmental value. On the basis of this analysis, I propose a model of culturally reflexive stewardship as potentially a more productive and theoretically consistent framework for characterizing such socially constructed environmental values and practices. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 214
页数:7
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Acheson Keith., 2001, MUCH ADO CULTURE N A
[2]   In search of forest resource values of indigenous peoples: Are nonmarket valuation techniques applicable? [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Beckley, T ;
MacDonald, DH ;
Just, L ;
Luckert, M ;
Murray, E ;
Phillips, W .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1998, 11 (01) :51-66
[3]  
Andersen M. D., 2012, NZ AGR RES EC SOC C
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[5]   A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Waage, Sissel ;
Winthrop, Robert .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 :E27-E39
[6]  
Baron J., 2005, EARTHSCAN READER ENV, P246
[7]   Fairness, stewardship and sustainable development [J].
Barrett, CB .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 19 (01) :11-17
[8]  
Boxberger D.L., 1994, ARCH ORAL HIST INVEN
[9]  
Brondizio E. S., 2010, EC ECOSYSTEMBIODIV, P149
[10]   SCHEMATA IN COGNITIVE ANTHROPOLOGY [J].
CASSON, RW .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 1983, 12 :429-462