Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy

被引:263
作者
Molloy, Elizabeth [1 ]
Boud, David [2 ]
Henderson, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
关键词
Feedback; learner agency; feedback literacy; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
There is an increasing focus on notions of feedback in which students are positioned as active players rather than recipients of information. These discussions have been either conceptual in character or have an empirical focus on designs to support learners in feedback processes. There has been little emphasis on learners' perspectives on, and experiences of, the role they play in such processes and what they need in order to benefit from feedback. This study therefore seeks to identify the characteristics of feedback literacy - that is, how students understand and can utilise feedback for their own learning - by analysing students' views of feedback processes drawing on a substantial data set derived from a study of feedback in two large universities. The analysis revealed seven groupings of learner feedback literacy, including understanding feedback purposes and roles, seeking information, making judgements about work quality, working with emotions, and processing and using information for the benefit of their future work (31 categories in total). By identifying these realised components of feedback literacy, in the form of illustrative examples, the emergent set of competencies can enable investigations of the development of feedback literacy and improve feedback designs in courses through alignment to these standards.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 540
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Rowe AD, 2017, ENABLING POWER ASSES, V5, P159, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_11
  • [22] Feedback modes matter: Comparing student perceptions of digital and non-digital feedback modes in higher education
    Ryan, Tracii
    Henderson, Michael
    Phillips, Michael
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 50 (03) : 1507 - 1523
  • [23] Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
    Sadler, D. Royce
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 35 (05) : 535 - 550
  • [24] Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students 'assessment literacy'
    Smith, Calvin Douglas
    Worsfold, Kate
    Davies, Lynda
    Fisher, Ron
    McPhail, Ruth
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (01) : 44 - 60
  • [25] Conceptualizing feedback literacy: knowing, being, and acting
    Sutton, Paul
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 49 (01) : 31 - 40
  • [26] Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work
    Tai, Joanna
    Ajjawi, Rola
    Boud, David
    Dawson, Phillip
    Panadero, Ernesto
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 76 (03) : 467 - 481
  • [27] Same-level peer-assisted learning in medical clinical placements: a narrative systematic review
    Tai, Joanna
    Molloy, Elizabeth
    Haines, Terry
    Canny, Benedict
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 50 (04) : 469 - 484
  • [28] The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: opportunities in clinical medical education
    Tai, Joanna Hong-Meng
    Canny, Benedict J.
    Haines, Terry P.
    Molloy, Elizabeth K.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2016, 21 (03) : 659 - 676
  • [29] Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes
    Winstone, Naomi E.
    Nash, Robert A.
    Parker, Michael
    Rowntree, James
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 52 (01) : 17 - 37