Psychometric validation of the cross-culturally adapted traditional Chinese version of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)

被引:17
作者
Cheung, Prudence Wing Hang [1 ]
Wong, Carlos King Ho [2 ]
Cheung, Jason Pui Yin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, 5-F Professorial Block, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Family Med & Primary Care, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Psychometrics; Low back pain; BBQ; FABQ; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; DISABILITY; RELIABILITY; TRANSLATION; ADAPTATION; VALIDITY; INTERVENTION; QUALITY; STATE;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-018-5576-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) into traditional Chinese for their use in patients experiencing low back pain (LBP). This was a prospective questionnaire translation and psychometric validation of the BBQ and FABQ in Chinese patients with back pain. Patients also completed the Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong) versions of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Short Form-12 version 2 (SF-12v2) questionnaires and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for LBP. Construct validity was assessed using Spearman's correlation test against the subscales and domains with similar constructs. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha (alpha). Sensitivity was determined by known-group comparisons. A total of 100 patients were recruited. Both BBQ (alpha = 0.810) and FABQ (alpha = 0.859) demonstrated excellent overall internal consistency. BBQ scores significantly correlated with ODI scores, VAS-LBP and all domains of SF-12v2 (p < 0.01-0.05), whereas only FABQ Work subscale correlated with ODI scores (p < 0.01) and VAS-LBP (p < 0.05). Both FABQ subscales correlated with only specific domains of SF-12v2 (p < 0.01-0.05). FABQ-W was sensitive to difference between patients with acute versus chronic back pain. Both the adapted BBQ and FABQ (Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong) were demonstrated to have satisfactory psychometric properties, with adequate internal consistencies, construct validity and sensitivity to certain clinical parameters. Our findings were based on a clinically relevant patient group and provides insight into patients' own perception of back pain which may often be different from that of surgeons. This is a platform for future cross-cultural comparisons. 2. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:1724 / 1733
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials
    Acquadro, Catherine
    Conway, Katrin
    Hareendran, Asha
    Aaronson, Neil
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : 509 - 521
  • [2] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire to the Arabic Language
    Alamrani, Samia
    Alsobayel, Hana
    Alnahdi, Ali H.
    Moloney, Niamh
    Mackey, Martin
    [J]. SPINE, 2016, 41 (11) : E681 - E686
  • [3] Translation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in Patients With Low Back Pain
    Alanazi, Fahad
    Gleeson, Peggy
    Olson, Sharon
    Roddey, Toni
    [J]. SPINE, 2017, 42 (07) : E411 - E416
  • [4] Questionnaires to Examine Back Pain Beliefs Held by Health Care Professionals A Psychometric Evaluation of Simplified Chinese Versions
    Chen, Gang
    Tan, B-K
    Jia, Hong-Liang
    O'Sullivan, Peter
    Burnett, Angus
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (18) : 1505 - 1511
  • [5] Chow Jonathan H W, 2005, Work, V25, P307
  • [6] Chung EJ, 2013, J EXERC REHABIL, V9, P532
  • [7] The Oswestry Disability Index
    Fairbank, JCT
    Pynsent, PB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) : 2940 - 2952
  • [8] Identifying psychosocial variables in patients with acute work-related low back pain: The importance of fear-avoidance beliefs
    Fritz, JM
    George, SZ
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 82 (10): : 973 - 983
  • [9] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire: Methodological aspects of the Norwegian version
    Grotle, Margreth
    Brox, Jens I.
    Vollestad, Nina K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2006, 38 (06) : 346 - 353
  • [10] Hasenbring M, 2001, SCHMERZ, V15, P442, DOI 10.1007/s004820100030