Local autonomy and interregional equality

被引:6
作者
Cappelen, Alexander W.
Tungodden, Bertil [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Sch Econ & Business Adm, Dept Econ, N-5035 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Econ, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00355-006-0183-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper shows how two important interregional transfer schemes, the foundation grant and the power equalization grant scheme, can be seen as two different interpretations of equal opportunity ethics. It provides characterizations of both transfer schemes by the use of basic liberal egalitarian principles. Both the foundation grant and the power equalization grant scheme make use of specific reference levels. The paper also shows how reasonable requirements on the transfer schemes restrict the set of possible reference levels.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 460
页数:18
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   EQUALITY AND EQUAL-OPPORTUNITY FOR WELFARE [J].
ARNESON, RJ .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 1989, 56 (01) :77-93
[2]  
Bossert W, 1996, SOC CHOICE WELFARE, V13, P343
[3]  
CAPPELEN A, 2003, POLITICS PHILOS EC, V2, P191
[4]  
CAPPELEN A, 2005, IN PRESS EC PHILOS
[5]  
COHEN GA, 1993, SELF OWNERSHIP FREED
[6]  
DWORKIN R, 1981, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V10, P283
[7]   EQUALITY AND RESPONSIBILITY [J].
FLEURBAEY, M .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1995, 39 (3-4) :683-689
[8]   EQUAL-OPPORTUNITY OR EQUAL SOCIAL OUTCOME [J].
FLEURBAEY, M .
ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 1995, 11 (01) :25-55
[9]  
LADD HF, 1994, NATL TAX J, V47, P211
[10]  
Le Grand J., 1991, EQUITY CHOICE ESSAY